Lisa Myobun
Not sure I understand what your question refers to.
Hi! This link will give you some visual details that can help clarify. The Sun card in particular.
http://www.wopc.co.uk/tarot/rider-waite/rider-waite-early-editions
Not sure I understand what your question refers to.
It refers to which version of the original decks has been used when the seller says: "meticulously taken from original artwork." Which very early copy of the deck has had had to work with ?
Hi! This link will give you some visual details that can help clarify. The Sun card in particular.
http://www.wopc.co.uk/tarot/rider-waite/rider-waite-early-editions
This is another fantastic resource for identifying the deck type:
http://muzendo.jp/blog/?cat=2
Pam A (Roses and Lilies)
http://muzendo.jp/blog/?p=18
Pam A
http://muzendo.jp/blog/?p=19
Pam B
http://muzendo.jp/blog/?p=20
Pam C
http://muzendo.jp/blog/?p=21
Pam D
http://muzendo.jp/blog/?p=22
I bought the non waterproof one off ebay. I thought they were crap. I was very disappointed. They are so thin it's like paper.
I just tested and I can do that with almost every card I tried. Even some quite thick ones.Also I prefer a card that I cannot do this to.
http://imgur.com/a/Fe3aN
I just tested and I can do that with almost every card I tried. Even some quite thick ones.
Certainly Galahad, I will offer constructive criticism. In my opinion the cards are thin and they do not feel good in my hands. Maybe this isn't an issue for you as cards feel differently to people. I prefer a more "rigid" card stock. Almost the entire deck is streaked, front and back. You can see it in these photos I took. I do not see these streaks in the older scanned decks. If you do, can you point me to the photos of original streaked decks?
http://imgur.com/a/8r1Kv
Also I prefer a card that I cannot do this to.
http://imgur.com/a/Fe3aN