Yatima
Since the recent attack has erased this thread installed after 06-15, I now reopen this discussion again, hoping that what was said on the 14 Nothelfer by roppo and jmd will be reposted again…and, of course, any other discussion wanted…
I was suggesting the hypothesis that the Tarot-imaginary leads us (back) to the Black Death as one of its possible origins regarding the iconography of the Tarot-trumps and told in their series as a reminder or an underlying story.
In realizing that the Tarot-image of Death is probably one of the least old regarding its iconographic representation, the question arises where it was taken from and to what end death was depicted this way: as a skeleton or often as a decomposing human body. Obviously (which can be followed up by looking at the iconographic analysis of Bob O’Neill (at tarot.com), it cannot be found before about 1360. However, from there on, it grows to omnipresence and also found its way into the early Tarot, especially the 14 trumps of the Bembo-deck (considering it as one of the oldest true Tarots).
Searching for a background, one reason (and surely not an unimportant one) seems to be evident in its immediat presence for these Death-depictions: the Black Death. Incidentally, it came to Europe from the East through Sicily and raged all over Northern Italy and in the whole of Europe between 1346-52 right at the time Death-depictions as in the Death card began. From about 100 million people living in the West at that time Black Death took away at least a third of the population (!) – in some areas even more. No wonder that in “art” Death appeared as an omnipresent Black Death from there on… Every 10 to 12 years was a year of pestilence within the next centuries… It was, indeed, all-present a force.
Coincidently, taking into consideration another note in the thread "Le Mat", roppa has put forward the thesis that the Fool resembles St. Roch, one of the 14 Nothelfer, often depicted with a “sign of the pestilence” – the torn down hose on one leg – and followed by a dog, being a child of the times of the pestilence, it strikes me as a possible origin of the Tarot-imaginary to be somehow deeply related to one of the major forces of the 14th and 15th century: the Black Death.
Scanning the other trumps – and we are talking of the very early trumps of the 15th century – regarding this theme, many relations to the Black Death pop up immediately: the relation of at least the Emperor and the Pope to the Dance macabre tradition, saying that all, even the leaders, the rich and the mighty, will be under the command of Death, especially under the heavily felt all-presence of the Black Death. This tradition in turn is again related to confraternities in Italy that saw their mission in helping the dying and burying the dead, especially in times of the pestilence. There are depictions of the Death taking away the weapon of the Cupid, arrow and dart, to misuse it as instrument of death. There might be relations to the Wheel, which was known since the early middle ages, but was used a sign of unpredictability of life and death especially at the times of the pestilence – as O’Neill notes in his analysis.
This possible intimate relationship between the origin of the Tarot imaginary and the Black Death might be strengthened when we take into consideration how it might have influenced one of the first extant decks: the Bembo-cards. We note that six cards were painted from another hand and probably later (Strength, Temperance, Star, Moon, Sun, World), two are missing (Devil, Tower). So let’s consider the remaining, allegedly “original” 14 cards and their structure. (In the meantime, I have brought this argument in a more systematic order in the thread on "XXI - Le Monde").
1. The series begins with the Fool: St. Roch or another Fool in times of the pestilence – I have referred to one very famous pestilence-fool known in Vienna from these times in the thread on "Le Mat": the “happy Augustin”.
2. The series ends with Death and Judgment. Hence, Death is the penultimate aim of the series, not somehow the middle of a mystic journey, but at the end of a real devastating journey of many at that time; it is very visible and immediately understandable. Given the interpretations of the time why this pestilence was haunting so crudely, the first answer (not only propagandized by the pope but held by many people) was a religious one: sin and punishment! So what is more evident as having the Great Judgment next to Death as ultimate aim of the whole experience of social and personal disaster through pestilence? (Whether there was a Devil and a Tower is not important here because depictions of the time often show Death accompanied by Hell’s Mouth and also by crumbling Towers).
3. All virtues are absent except one: Justice. We know of the Dummett B order (Ferrara/Venice) that it has not used Justice as a virtue but as the Eschatological Event of Justice by elevating it to the penultimate position following Judgment (Angel). So it is not impossible to understand the sole presence of Justice (of all virtues) not to mean a virtue but an apocalyptic process. In this case, the black rider over the head of the female Dame Justice might refer to St. Michael, the Archangel of eschatological Judgment. In a time, from 1346 on, that was filled of a Death-cult, Flagellant repentance, and pregnant with awaiting the immediate end of the world (Joachim of Fiore, Spiritual Franciscans and others), it seems appropriate to depict “Judgment for Justice” following (or surrounding) the Black Death as (a very real) “sign” of an evil world to be destructed soon.
4. Love and Victory (Chariot) might easily refer to the impossibility to build on anything in a world filled with Death. When Death is taking Cupid’s bow, we know why…
5. Fate (Wheel) and Time (Hermit) just play other accords to the melody, stating the message already given: of “time’s up” or “beware Death in every second of your little life” to “try what you want, Death comes when it (not you) is (are) ready”…
6. Only three of the Bembo-cards may be left not showing immediate connection with the Black Death. The Hanged Man, however, can be related to the Black Death insofar the religious and apocalyptic depictions of Death shows sometimes hanging men being punished for their sins. The Popess may be just a nun with regalia because she had authority of jurisdiction; so she is related to the other human states. I do not know what the “Magician” (really a wrong name for the elegant man in red in the Bembo-deck, though) could mean except someone being (comparatively) rich but, as we know (from the whole series and how it ends), being on its “last supper” when (Black) Death comes.
A last argument in favor of this thesis is this: If it is really true that Michelino-deck is the first “triumphal” deck (at least earlier than any known triumphal deck with the true Tarot-subjects), it follows that 1. “trionfi” must not be identified with what we name “Tarot” – it depicts 16 Greek gods – and that 2. the origin of the imaginary of the subjects we (today) name “Tarot” was not necessarily the only or first series of icons taken to represent the triumphal tradition, but this relation was rather contingent. This leaves space for the idea that the origin of a trionfi deck that depicts what we finally recognize as Tarot – as in the Bembo-deck – could have come from many sources (outside the triumphal tradition). One that prevailed could have been the Black Death-story, which, when it was invented, was related to the triumphal tradition that might have been (re)enacted (by the Vicontis) and being accompanied by a trionfi-deck…
So, the 14 Bembo-cards could represent a spiritual "icon" in the wake of the Black Death, taken up at the Visconti-court to be included in the triumphal tradition that seemingly furthered the production of triumphal decks…
Yatima
I was suggesting the hypothesis that the Tarot-imaginary leads us (back) to the Black Death as one of its possible origins regarding the iconography of the Tarot-trumps and told in their series as a reminder or an underlying story.
In realizing that the Tarot-image of Death is probably one of the least old regarding its iconographic representation, the question arises where it was taken from and to what end death was depicted this way: as a skeleton or often as a decomposing human body. Obviously (which can be followed up by looking at the iconographic analysis of Bob O’Neill (at tarot.com), it cannot be found before about 1360. However, from there on, it grows to omnipresence and also found its way into the early Tarot, especially the 14 trumps of the Bembo-deck (considering it as one of the oldest true Tarots).
Searching for a background, one reason (and surely not an unimportant one) seems to be evident in its immediat presence for these Death-depictions: the Black Death. Incidentally, it came to Europe from the East through Sicily and raged all over Northern Italy and in the whole of Europe between 1346-52 right at the time Death-depictions as in the Death card began. From about 100 million people living in the West at that time Black Death took away at least a third of the population (!) – in some areas even more. No wonder that in “art” Death appeared as an omnipresent Black Death from there on… Every 10 to 12 years was a year of pestilence within the next centuries… It was, indeed, all-present a force.
Coincidently, taking into consideration another note in the thread "Le Mat", roppa has put forward the thesis that the Fool resembles St. Roch, one of the 14 Nothelfer, often depicted with a “sign of the pestilence” – the torn down hose on one leg – and followed by a dog, being a child of the times of the pestilence, it strikes me as a possible origin of the Tarot-imaginary to be somehow deeply related to one of the major forces of the 14th and 15th century: the Black Death.
Scanning the other trumps – and we are talking of the very early trumps of the 15th century – regarding this theme, many relations to the Black Death pop up immediately: the relation of at least the Emperor and the Pope to the Dance macabre tradition, saying that all, even the leaders, the rich and the mighty, will be under the command of Death, especially under the heavily felt all-presence of the Black Death. This tradition in turn is again related to confraternities in Italy that saw their mission in helping the dying and burying the dead, especially in times of the pestilence. There are depictions of the Death taking away the weapon of the Cupid, arrow and dart, to misuse it as instrument of death. There might be relations to the Wheel, which was known since the early middle ages, but was used a sign of unpredictability of life and death especially at the times of the pestilence – as O’Neill notes in his analysis.
This possible intimate relationship between the origin of the Tarot imaginary and the Black Death might be strengthened when we take into consideration how it might have influenced one of the first extant decks: the Bembo-cards. We note that six cards were painted from another hand and probably later (Strength, Temperance, Star, Moon, Sun, World), two are missing (Devil, Tower). So let’s consider the remaining, allegedly “original” 14 cards and their structure. (In the meantime, I have brought this argument in a more systematic order in the thread on "XXI - Le Monde").
1. The series begins with the Fool: St. Roch or another Fool in times of the pestilence – I have referred to one very famous pestilence-fool known in Vienna from these times in the thread on "Le Mat": the “happy Augustin”.
2. The series ends with Death and Judgment. Hence, Death is the penultimate aim of the series, not somehow the middle of a mystic journey, but at the end of a real devastating journey of many at that time; it is very visible and immediately understandable. Given the interpretations of the time why this pestilence was haunting so crudely, the first answer (not only propagandized by the pope but held by many people) was a religious one: sin and punishment! So what is more evident as having the Great Judgment next to Death as ultimate aim of the whole experience of social and personal disaster through pestilence? (Whether there was a Devil and a Tower is not important here because depictions of the time often show Death accompanied by Hell’s Mouth and also by crumbling Towers).
3. All virtues are absent except one: Justice. We know of the Dummett B order (Ferrara/Venice) that it has not used Justice as a virtue but as the Eschatological Event of Justice by elevating it to the penultimate position following Judgment (Angel). So it is not impossible to understand the sole presence of Justice (of all virtues) not to mean a virtue but an apocalyptic process. In this case, the black rider over the head of the female Dame Justice might refer to St. Michael, the Archangel of eschatological Judgment. In a time, from 1346 on, that was filled of a Death-cult, Flagellant repentance, and pregnant with awaiting the immediate end of the world (Joachim of Fiore, Spiritual Franciscans and others), it seems appropriate to depict “Judgment for Justice” following (or surrounding) the Black Death as (a very real) “sign” of an evil world to be destructed soon.
4. Love and Victory (Chariot) might easily refer to the impossibility to build on anything in a world filled with Death. When Death is taking Cupid’s bow, we know why…
5. Fate (Wheel) and Time (Hermit) just play other accords to the melody, stating the message already given: of “time’s up” or “beware Death in every second of your little life” to “try what you want, Death comes when it (not you) is (are) ready”…
6. Only three of the Bembo-cards may be left not showing immediate connection with the Black Death. The Hanged Man, however, can be related to the Black Death insofar the religious and apocalyptic depictions of Death shows sometimes hanging men being punished for their sins. The Popess may be just a nun with regalia because she had authority of jurisdiction; so she is related to the other human states. I do not know what the “Magician” (really a wrong name for the elegant man in red in the Bembo-deck, though) could mean except someone being (comparatively) rich but, as we know (from the whole series and how it ends), being on its “last supper” when (Black) Death comes.
A last argument in favor of this thesis is this: If it is really true that Michelino-deck is the first “triumphal” deck (at least earlier than any known triumphal deck with the true Tarot-subjects), it follows that 1. “trionfi” must not be identified with what we name “Tarot” – it depicts 16 Greek gods – and that 2. the origin of the imaginary of the subjects we (today) name “Tarot” was not necessarily the only or first series of icons taken to represent the triumphal tradition, but this relation was rather contingent. This leaves space for the idea that the origin of a trionfi deck that depicts what we finally recognize as Tarot – as in the Bembo-deck – could have come from many sources (outside the triumphal tradition). One that prevailed could have been the Black Death-story, which, when it was invented, was related to the triumphal tradition that might have been (re)enacted (by the Vicontis) and being accompanied by a trionfi-deck…
So, the 14 Bembo-cards could represent a spiritual "icon" in the wake of the Black Death, taken up at the Visconti-court to be included in the triumphal tradition that seemingly furthered the production of triumphal decks…
Yatima