Aeclectic Tarot
Tarot Cards & Reviews Free Tarot Readings Tarot Books Tarot Card Meanings Tarot Forum

Have the gems changed for sun signs?

  > Aeclectic Tarot Forum > Beyond Tarot > Astrology


 
marigold's's Avatar
marigold's  marigold's is offline
Resident
 
Join Date: 01 Oct 2007
Location: AZ, USA
Posts: 60
marigold's 
Have the gems changed for sun signs?


When I was a bitty person interested in astrology (ages 4-10, at least) I remember reading different gem associations with the sun signs than I'm reading about today. For instance, I remember reading that Scorpio's "stone" was the lodestone and Cancer's stone was the "pigeon blood" or ruby, but my sister and her best friend insist that ruby is Leo's stone (and Parker's Astrology backs them up.) I know I'm not too old, but does anybody else remember the old gem/sign associations and do I need to swap out a lifetime's worth of jewelry if the gem/sign's don't jibe? (just kidding on that last part : ) ) I guess, what's the story with the changing associations?

Thanks!
Marigold
Top   #1
floracove's Avatar
floracove  floracove is offline
Citizen
 
Join Date: 30 Mar 2002
Location: Beneath the tryisting tree.
Posts: 3,726
floracove 
Lightbulb


Hi marigold, I do know that there are traditional gemstones as well as new ones that have been added or interchanged and those that certain cultures use to represent or align with their own beliefs, i suppose what we have now is a blended child of the traditional, modern and cultural.
Top   #2
Minderwiz's Avatar
Minderwiz  Minderwiz is offline
Student of Astrology
 
Join Date: 20 Apr 2002
Location: Wigan, UK
Posts: 7,888
Minderwiz 

Interestingly, classical writers seem to attribute the rulership of gems to the planets, not the signs - I suppose it is the modern conflation of signs with planets that has led to the signs being associated with gems.

Lodestone according to William Lilly (17th Century) is ruled by Mars and as Mars is the ruler of Scorpio I can see where the connection has been made.

Ruby is attributed by a number of writers to the Sun (ruler of Leo) so again I can see where the association with the sign has come. I checked with Lee Lehman's book of Rulerships and could not find anyone attributing Ruby to the Moon but that is not to say that someone somewhere made that association.

Indeed there seems to be no agreed system used by classical writers and even the same writer might list a stone as being ruled by more than one planet. Thus Lilly lists Topaz for both Mercury and Jupiter.

My feeling would be that if you have come to use a set of associations with signs and you are happy with it then keep to it. There isn't a 'correct' set of associations or rulerships so no one can say you are wrong. You might be in a minority but if it works for you then keep to it.
Top   #3
ravenest's Avatar
ravenest  ravenest is offline
ravenator
 
Join Date: 02 Feb 2006
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 13,835
ravenest 

Yes, that's a good anser.

But also, for Cancer, I thought that Moonstone was pretty well accepted.

It depends what system one uses (as Minde says) the Vedic classification is quiet different from the western.

I use a western Euro, hermetic a la Golden Dawn / Crowley correspodence.
Crowleys 777 is a good book for it as he doesnt just say ; This is this (because I said so) but endeavours, where he can, to explain WHY it is so. (I like that).
Top   #4
Minderwiz's Avatar
Minderwiz  Minderwiz is offline
Student of Astrology
 
Join Date: 20 Apr 2002
Location: Wigan, UK
Posts: 7,888
Minderwiz 

Wow Ravenest and I agree!

I don't want this next point to detract from what either I or Ravenest said before. So let me repeat that if your present system works well for you don't look to change it.

IF you want to explore the area of Astrological correspondances even more, then can I suggest that you ask yourself in what way you see the link between gem and signs. Personally I would see this as an association rather than a rulership. I would see planets as rulers of gemstones because planets act whereas signs simply modify or reflect the characteristics of their (planet) ruler.

Melody lists signs against each gemstone (Love is in the Earth, a Kaleidoscopoe of Crystals) but does not indicate rulership. So again I'd take this as referring to association.

I've also noted since my last post that several sources categorically state that a crystal is not ruled by one planet or sign. This makes sense to me because gems can have the characteristics of more than one planet or sign.

I'm not familiar with the Vedic associations but on one Vedic site I did see reference to their being different sign associations but common planetary rulers. The sign association was said to be to the Moon Sign Irashi) rather than Sun sign I'm not sure how widespread that view is, perhaps Ravenest can shed some light on it.

Exploring some of these issues might highten your understanding of the gems but don't feel that you need to change from your current system. What it might well do is make you more certain of that system.
Top   #5
ravenest's Avatar
ravenest  ravenest is offline
ravenator
 
Join Date: 02 Feb 2006
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 13,835
ravenest 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minderwiz
I've also noted since my last post that several sources categorically state that a crystal is not ruled by one planet or sign. This makes sense to me because gems can have the characteristics of more than one planet or sign.
I agree, I recently procured a large quantity of Topaz sand (98% pure crushed Topaz) I want to use this in a type of Bio-dynamic process. When I look in 777 Topaz is in several columns; Planetary Sun, Elemental Air and constellational ( ) Taurus. I figure it is a drying fertile substance, just what I need with my melons going rotten in all this soggy rain at the moment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minderwiz
I'm not familiar with the Vedic associations but on one Vedic site I did see reference to their being different sign associations but common planetary rulers. The sign association was said to be to the Moon Sign Irashi) rather than Sun sign I'm not sure how widespread that view is, perhaps Ravenest can shed some light on it.
The only 'light' I can shed on this weird (to me) vedic stuff is an old guru that insisted the Sun was female and he could prove it - if the Sun wasnt female, she wouldnt be afraid to come out at night.

Perhaps he was joking? I hope so.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minderwiz
Exploring some of these issues might highten your understanding of the gems but don't feel that you need to change from your current system. What it might well do is make you more certain of that system.
A current system can help you develop a sensible skeleton from which you can further develop specific muscles for your own particiular usage.
Top   #6




 


 


Tarot Cards & Reviews Free Tarot Readings Tarot Books Tarot Card Meanings Tarot Forum
Aeclectic Tarot Forum Links
· Tarot
· Tarot Special Interest
· Beyond Tarot
· Forum Library

Aeclectic Tarot Categories
· Angel Decks
· Dark & Gothic Decks
· Goddess Decks
· Fairy Decks
· Doreen Virtue Decks
· Beginner Decks
· Cat Decks
· Pagan & Wiccan Decks
· Ancient Egyptian Decks
· Celtic Decks
· Lenormand Decks
· Rider-Waite Decks
· Marseilles Decks
· Thoth Decks
· Oracle Decks
· List All Decks
· Popular Tarot Decks
· Available Decks
· Tarot Books
· What's New

Copyright © 1996 - 2019 Aeclectic Tarot. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy. Contact us.