Abrac
Looks like the book could be interesting; but I refuse to waste my time scrolling through it to find out. Maybe that was their intent, to weed out all but those with the most time on their hands.
I wonder why there needs to be a descendant of the Crowley/Harris Thoth, but for me, if there is one, it is the Tabula Mundi.
The TM seems to have updated the Thoth's ideas but not deviated from them in any radical way. I think that's a good thing.
Don't rely on snooty responses like the one ravenest has given you regarding hidden paths. These are NOT paths that someone has made up out of thin air but constitute all the paths which are implied but never shown in their entirety. There are exactly 16 such paths and there will always be 16 *hidden paths* to any tree presenting us with 10 sephiroth and 22 paths. It is called a *diamond* because of its shape and classes as a sutra according to its meditative virtue. There happen to be 16 binary tetragrams as well as 16 geomantic characters which is an important fact not covered in AC's work ANYWHERE in ANY of his written works. We have corrected that oversight along with many others in our own deck...a deck which builds on the best of occult tradition up to his time and is directly attuned to his expectations of serious occult students moving forward in time...m1thr0sNice.
But for my taste there is a little bit too much cgi. Also I am not well versed in the I Ching, on which the mutational alchemy tarot seems to rely much.
Nevertheless, I wonder about the attributions of court cards to "diamond paths". There is a short explanation at the bottom of http://abrahadabra.com/mutational-alchemy-tarot-book/introduction/
I have never heard about the "Hidden Diamond Sutra" or some concept of "hidden paths". can someone please elaborate?