JylliM
No problem with nudity per se, but good luck with painting a penis that isn't comical or just plain distracting!
I'm fine with it. Done naturally, I love it - but only (as mentioned above) when it's democratically done - men and women. I can't stand those decks when it's all bouncing breasts and supine nymphs and then buttoned up males (like the Casanova). Times have changed.No problem with nudity per se, but good luck with painting a penis that isn't comical or just plain distracting!
It's basically that they just look a bit silly. Many men of my acquaintance concur But the one everyone throws wobblies about - Druidcraft HM - is well done. One of the rare examples that hangs rightI'm fine with it. Done naturally, I love it - but only (as mentioned above) when it's democratically done - men and women. I can't stand those decks when it's all bouncing breasts and supine nymphs and then buttoned up males (like the Casanova). Times have changed.
The nudity in the Mary-El is beautifully done. You could almost not notice the penis in the Fool, so naturally is it a part of the whole. Same with the King of Disks (?) - is that the one - the lascivious satyr. Just beautiful. The artist has very successfully painted a penis - in both cases - that isn't comical or distracting
I really don't get the attitude that penises are for tittering at.
How does a penis look any sillier than a breast or labia flopping about? Sometimes a clitoris is very large, elongated or silly looking.It's basically that they just look a bit silly. Many men of my acquaintance concur But the one everyone throws wobblies about - Druidcraft HM - is well done. One of the rare examples that hangs right