If it were strictly status, I would also go with the King of Pentacles, but personal style has him more as the Knight of Wands (my first take on him a while ago was that he has a "thin-skinned, hair-trigger temperament"). Regarding not knowing what he's doing, I don't see him at all as a clueless Don Quixote type. He knows exactly what he's after: dismantling Obama's legacy and defying the globalist elite agenda one Executive Order at a time. Whether he can get legislation through Congress that makes meaningful and constructive change will be testimony as to whether the Knight is upright or reversed. Although it goes beyond the question, as a trump card I could see the Fool as a political innocent, not so much as a buffoon. Another thing I called him earlier was "The Man Who Would Be King," so the Emperor may be what he fancies himself as (but he will probably settle for the King of Wands). He might someday reach a "Chariot" sense of direction and momentum, but in an earlier reading I had him as a maverick Hermit isolating himself from consensus rule. I'm being careful not to say he's a charlatan or an incompetent simply because I don't like him or his style, since it has yet to be demonstrated as undeniable truth.