Cat*
Hey, the RWS (no matter which version) is not a fluffy bunny deck!teomat said:Makes it very hard to stay committed to your fluffy bunny IDS deck when everyone else is making out with their Holy Guardian Angels...
I know what you mean. While I have a few decks that have been the subject of a gushing thread, I hardly ever look at these threads. Gushing on its own just isn't very interesting to me. Sure, tell me what you like about a deck, but definitely also tell me what you don't like, what you had a hard time understanding, what made you think, etc.teomat said:But I have to admit also that even though I feel a bit left out when it comes to discussions about these hugely popular decks, a small rebellious side of me feels content that I'm NOT part of the crowd. I hope this doesn't sound too nasty but my eyes glaze over whenever I see one of these huge gushing threads. I'm always drawn to the little ones, slipping away down the forum table talking about a deck that's not very popular or unmentioned (e.g the Fergus Hall or some obscure Lo Scarabeo deck etc).
I might have bought a deck or three because someone else (usually people I believe to be more than "just gushers") said great things about them, but the first deck I really started to work with was the Manara. I believe it's been so easy for me to experiment with it precisely because hardly anyone had ever said anything about it. I had no standard to live up to besides my own. (Mind you, I never studied that deck, just did lots of readings with it.)
Like you, I'm often drawn to decks that don't get mass praise. I like odd, weird, unusual, quirky decks. This summer, for example, I had fun with my Phantasmagoric Theater (but rarely ever posted anything about it). I only two of other AT people who actually use(d) and like that deck: thorhammer and KarlThomas.
That's just geeks to you. You don't have to participate in their tarot geek talk, much of which is just opinions (if educated ones) anyway. If your deck does for you what you want it to do, it's the right one. If those geeky threads make you feel inadequate, don't go there.teomat said:This is also how I feel about my IDS deck. It's not as popular as the standard RWS or the new Commemmorative PCS one, and although it's not considered a 'proper' or clean reproduction of the RWS by purists, it's the one that I'm most drawn too.
I completely agree! (I hugely enjoy talking the Greenwood with the very few others who also use it right now, but there's a reason why I don't post in the Greenwood gush threads...)teomat said:Admittedly, using a deck that's not very popular can make things a bit lonely when you want to talk about it, but at the same time it can make the deck seem more personal to you. And when doing an IDS, I think that's a major plus.