I don't know that this relates well here, but I've heard cards readers say, in a divinatory vein, that the Chariot denotes "movement". Conversely, I sense an awesome stillness.
There was a thread once about the Priestess, which I think is relevant here, although I can't remember its name. I do think the Chariot conveys movement, though, and so does the Hierophant, and both
because of the Priestess. Ironically, it is easier to explain my point through the RWS. The Hierophant, descending down from Chochma, is the Word, the rules on how to create the universe, and well he should, for he descends to Chesed, where space "officially" begins. The actual structure of the world, the four elements, etc. The Divine wisdom, the words that make up the Torah.
The Chariot, on the other hand, holds within it the
spirit of the Word, its holiness, its impetus, descending from Binah, the vessel God builds for itself, down to Geburah of change, disruption, formation, lava, chaos, mixing the four elements of Chesed,
limiting Chesed's unlimited, immobile outpouring. The Chariot moves in the same way you can't see a plane actually move by looking out of its window; everything is just so big to it seems to be standing still.
Connect the Hierophant and the Chariot, and you get the Priestess. The High Priestess is traditionally seated inside the Temple, and in my opinion is not
in the Holy of Holies, she
is the Holy of Holies. The highest initiation is to actually open the Arc of the Covenant (commune with the Priestess) and so reach the ultimate resolving of dualities, Keter. "Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live." (Exodus 33:20)
The problem is one of Humpty Dumpty, as Kabbalah makes up its own words (and pays them extra!). When Chesed is said to be "outpouring" the connotation is of movement, even though it isn't. When Geburah is said to be limiting, the connotation is to immobility, even though it moves and is dynamic.
ETA:
and vice versa. Everything that moves also stays constant, another Humpty Dumpty there, since things can be more than one opposing thing at a time. I find it easiest just not to try and resolve these things, since they make perfect sense when abandoning the intellectual