Fulgour said:
if someone is going to read a card upside down, then why not read it backwards as well?
Backwards sounds like a good idea to try to me.
I think variations on the meaning which are shown by the way the throw of cards falls can be very useful. Why not upside down. Many subtleties of thought can be conveyed well through inversion. Turning ideas inside on their head can be useful. So can turning them sideways, or inside out.
Of course this anti reversal idea seems based on both an image-centered reading approach, and also a non-fixed meanings approach. Those approaches are not the only possible ones. (And even the image centered approach often works well with reversals, depending upon the deck used, and the person using it.)
Helvetica said:
Or face down? - LOL - you make a good point Fulgour. I'm with you on that - it's common sense, to me.
I think common sense can be a real trap. Divination itself is contrary to common sense.
some cards do look like something upside-down: the Aces in many decks, for example (certainly in Marseille and RWS). A reversed Ace of Swords, facing the ground, always makes me think of a knight sheathing his sword, or placing it with the point on the ground to do homage to the king or to pray (that was a very common gesture in the times when swords were used). Yet I read in some tarot books it means power abused!!! How's that???
How's that? If it is seen as less of a visual, and more as an idea. If a sword is not a sword, but is power- then an inversion of that can be power abused. I don't see the problem with that idea.
I also don't see any problem with seeing an inverted ace of swords as a sheathed sword. Or, heck, a sideways ace of swords as power diverted. Why not. As long as the person reading gets the message that is coming through.
(As a sidenote- an interesting old thread about the meanings of swords:
Swords-intellect or conflict? )