I think all this confusion ( I dont mean you are all confused, most posts make good sense, I mean 'some' are 'all confused') is due to the issue of falling in to the first category of tarot usage.
The fortune teller. People want their fortune told how it 'will be' , the 'set in stone' view.
But now, we realise that is a future that can only be discerned in the 'future present' ; when we open the box. From the 'this present now' perspective, anything can happen in the future. Its nearly like a religious belief , the way some look at tarot, and when it doesnt fulfill, or is seen to be false, they appear cross, angry or ripped off. Sorry, the fault lied within themselves as they had the wrong view from the beginning.
The Magician. People realise the future is a bunch of threads leading to an event, as we go along threads branch off to other event possibilities that dont occur, the threads vanish, disappear, go into another dimension, whatever. As we get closer to the event, or as Michael said, 'more immanent ', fewer potential outcomes seem possible, but still, they can swerve and bend at that last minute. This type of reading is how best to manipulate events so they turn out the way you want.
IMO this is a case of someone coming from position 1 and still being jacked off about it. In essence, it is like someone buying a lucky charm bracelet, the next day they have an accident so they take the bracelet back to the shop and want their money back.
In brief;
Belief - tarot predicts the future .
Occurrence - tarot didnt predict the future.
Reaction - upset at tarot.
Reality - Your belief was wrong.
55 pages later. ... It might be time to 'review the internal map' ?