tarotbear
i think it was said at one time robin wood said she wasnt' allowed to release any tarot work that would complete with the robin wood tarot, which we disussed among ourselves did that mean a sequal to her first deck even if it was released by the same company ?
In my book contract there is a clause somewhere that says the author is not allowed to do anything that would be considered detrimental to the publisher's selling of the 'work' - such as buying 1,000 copies to give away for free, or quoting large sections of it on the Internet - both actions of which would make people think twice about purchasing a copy when they were being given away for free.
I know people are thinking that Llewellyn should be thinking 'If one RW decks sells well, why not have TWO RW decks?' Chances are the Marketing Dept figured out that people would probably NOT buy both decks, so sales for #2 could possibly cut into the sales for #1. Also, if RW was to create a sequel deck many people might see it as "same ol' same ol'", so RW would have to create an entire new and different deck and a big company like Llewellyn does not kill their cash cows or geese that lay golden eggs.