Nice, Spoonbender! I particularly like the hats in both figures. In Marseilles decks, both the Valet d’Épées and the Valet de Deniers wear similar hats, which look like simple straw hats; but the Valet d’Épées is armed, and it is unusual to see a guy raising a sword but wearing a peasant-like straw hat. Well, Donatello’s David causes the same feeling, at first. He wears a Tuscan shepherd’s hat, surrounded by a laurel wreath, the whole being very similar to a woman’s straw hat of Italian or French style. In the case of David, and although this feature just adds to the peculiar erotic nature of the statue (together with his androgynous nudity), we must remember he was, indeed, a shepherd, and not a warrior. In fact, he was a poet, to whom many biblical psalms are attributed. Every aspect of Donatello’s “scandalous” sculpture is in fact “historically” and symbolically accurate: the shepherd’s hat, the laurel leaves (symbols of poetry, symbols of the Medici family of Florence, symbols of triumph from the Olympic Games in ancient Greece), and his youth. Donatello preferred to create a non-heroic figure, evoking those young athletes from Greek or Roman classical sculpture, instead of a Christian warrior (like Michelangelo’s latter David). It is interesting to see our Valet at this light: a young boy with a straw hat, who accidentally found himself in possession of a sword... and what will he do with it? The sword does not really belong to him, does it? It didn’t belong to David, either. David did not fight Goliath with a sword. King Saul gave him full armour, but he refused it, and went forth to meet Goliath dressed as usual, like a simple shepherd, armed only with a slingshot and a staff. He only needed a sword latter, in order to cut Goliath’s head.
By the way, Donatello’s David is indeed looking to the right, not to the left.