Bertrand
Hello,
Generally speaking when an exception is contradicted by all the others samples, it's discarded as an anomaly, so in that way here I find it a bit risky to use a unique occurence as a general rule : the Rochus Schaer "orientation" may well be an exception as much as the presence of a flower on the X of swords.
The fact that this exception corroborates an hypothesis about the cards meaning should lead to question said hypothesis rather than seeing a confirmation there - as you noted yourself this deck is quite altered when compared to the pattern emerging from all known TdM2 decks. Going back and forth from the "signification" hypothesis to the "anomaly" deck is a typical case of a circular reasonning - and a dead end if you ask me.
Looking at a parallel example : spanish suited cards, we can see that the Ace of Swords is sometimes clearly pointing upwards (Piacentine), downwards (Aluette, Portuguese pattern), not clearly determined (some older spanish decks).
The safest remaining hypothesis would be to consider that swords may have been considered pointing upwards or downwards following different cardmakers, and maybe some of them didn't care, and maybe some of them had opposite opinions about that matter.
Maybe future discoveries will add more consistent data to sort out this issue (not a very important issue if you ask me)
Bertrand
Generally speaking when an exception is contradicted by all the others samples, it's discarded as an anomaly, so in that way here I find it a bit risky to use a unique occurence as a general rule : the Rochus Schaer "orientation" may well be an exception as much as the presence of a flower on the X of swords.
The fact that this exception corroborates an hypothesis about the cards meaning should lead to question said hypothesis rather than seeing a confirmation there - as you noted yourself this deck is quite altered when compared to the pattern emerging from all known TdM2 decks. Going back and forth from the "signification" hypothesis to the "anomaly" deck is a typical case of a circular reasonning - and a dead end if you ask me.
on the contrary it would be fair to say that this unique example contradicted by all known data isn't relevant to issue any conclusion.it is fair enough to say that with all these elements taken into consideration, it is quite clear that the swords in the Sword suit traditionally do not point upward, but downward standing at rest
Looking at a parallel example : spanish suited cards, we can see that the Ace of Swords is sometimes clearly pointing upwards (Piacentine), downwards (Aluette, Portuguese pattern), not clearly determined (some older spanish decks).
The safest remaining hypothesis would be to consider that swords may have been considered pointing upwards or downwards following different cardmakers, and maybe some of them didn't care, and maybe some of them had opposite opinions about that matter.
Maybe future discoveries will add more consistent data to sort out this issue (not a very important issue if you ask me)
Bertrand