I must be masochistic, but someone is interested looking at the amount of views- so I will keep going
It is said the Lombard Man lived between Holy Water and Sea Water (the Church and the State) and implies both can be used, and both can cause Death or exile.
Gaming lived there too! As did the Jew.
Many of the laws about gambling spring from selfish interests in the business, Catholic and political sectors. For example preventing work been done for the landowner. The stigma associated with gambling turns out to be a method of preventing competition from gambling (in this case the use of coins when there was a bullion famine or stockpiling of coins by the gaming house)and lead to misguided moral policies. To say that gambling was sinful, but not on Christmas day seems misguided to me. To enact laws to prevent the subjects gambling and have the elite and the clergy be allowed was two faced. The Church preached and moralised about the Jew, but both State and Church used their services.All this was obvious to the gambler and the gaming house- the Jew and the Banker.
Whether TdM was a style that lent it self to a multifaceted sequence of 22 that already existed and borrowed it- it seems to me that it was used to depict the use of money and and law as it affected the game when it was invented. I use the Tarot in an occult way, not a gaming way- but the images of the Noblet for example tell me a different story. It is that of of the social somewhat ironic take on what was happening between 1400 - 1600. For the game I think the medieval English term would be 'these card doth cock a snook' at both Church and State.
There is not one card in the TdM that this could not be applied to this view of moral and State economics from my point of view.
Now feel free to rubbish this, agree with me, debate with me. You have my permission to call me names (that seems to bring the History forum to life) start a slanging match- whatever! Bring the History forum out of the wilderness and post.
~Rosanne