gregory
I'm rather puzzled about that too. Anyone have the original to look at the copyright info ? The Greenwood quite clearly says the artwork is HERS - so I hope we aren't about to see that reissued as a deck on such rubbish stock etc.... If they have said in this edition that the art is copyright to her I would REALLY like to know how they managed to print it legally.I'm glad it is back in print, but I was wondering that too.
If she gave permission for this new printing...maybe she doesn't hold any rights to the oracle deck like she does with the tarot deck.
ETA just saw McFaire's post about her having shared the copyright. Oh. OK.
Connections do not have the best reputation - and when Rodney pointed out once that they had printed a card with the WRONG TITLE on - they didn't give a toss. I've had two of theirs with duplicates and missing cards. I don't buy theirs any more unless I can open the deck before purchasing - as it is such a pain returning stuff, and even more so when the mistake is repeated.
Oops that was Cico. But I do have a couple of rather badly printed Connections decks, too.... It seems to me that Caitlin Matthews told me once that in the US, Connections is Tuttle ?