Perhaps Closrapexa, when he recovers from his physical pain, can explain that to me ?
I have no idea, that's why I asked about the LWB, whether it could shed some light on the subject. I don't see anything particularly "Thothy" in it, but you know, whatever. I don't really care. However, my question was how it would be possible to go about studying a Thoth deck (which is obviously open for debate) while divorcing the study from Crowley himself. Now that's something that can't be done.
But I think that goes to a common misconception about the Thoth. Waite designed his deck to be rather enigmatic, almost neutral. The agenda is there, but it is deliberately obscured both because of its scenic nature as well as lack of documentation. It is practically made to be cloned.
Not so the Thoth, who's philosophy and reason for existing are ingrained in every aspect of it. Take those things away and you're left with nothing, really.
But in general I agree with someone here who said that what the OP probably needs most is a grounding in GD structure, simply because that's the method through which the Thoth conveys its ideas, its language. I'll grant that the deck in question has none of that either, but Book T is the best answer I've got, even if it isn't perfect.