Cor serpentis
Idk if I understood your answer aright...
There's difference between event and horary (or I'm doing wrong for years ). Eg. event chart is for time&place of some event like wedding (exat moment when newlyweds say "yes"), time of begining of some sport match etc., even our natals are some kind of event chart and in some cases there can be helpfull elections if querent(s) are interested in astrology and/or can set that moment. In some cases it is possible, in some isn't. More examples regarding that: I maybe can choose the best (available) moment to marry or buy something, but I can't set time when my exam will begin So I think that horary is not just event chart, 'cause event charts are including more branches of astrology.
Back to horary (and question if I properly understood your explanation). I'm still sticking the second way you explained (as I in my first post). Why? As Frawley said, we don't make natal chart for time&place when baby is conceived, but when is born. Same is for horary - majority of questions we ask ourselves bother us for some time, we're thinking about it a lot before we make chart and it is unsure when question is definitely "born". So, as you wrote, proper chart will be for the time and place when astrologer received and understood question. Is that what you tried to say or I'm wrong?
And, of course, almost all ancient&medieval authors ("artists" ) said that horary can't give an answer which is in contrast with natal potential of the querent. Eg: question is "will I be rich?", but querent in his natal chart does not have potential to be rich, so in horary chart may be beautiful trine with great reception between significators, but it won't mean that querent will find bunch of money on the street or earn enormus amount of money in short time.
In Lily's (and others) "time" (ie, when they lived, worked and wrote their books) cell phones and internet didn't exist, so maybe they can receive a question only by letter or some other person were just messenger, but only maybe in few cases; I can't remember some example for that kind of q&a and for what time and place they made chart. I think that they made majority of their horary charts when querent directly asked them question, when that querent came to them or met them somewhere and then asked a question.
If I correctly understood your post, that's correct approach, am I right?
I noticed that but I'm not sure if here are others who answers on horary questions, so I asked, just in case
Anyway, thanks for answer
Regards,
Cor
There's difference between event and horary (or I'm doing wrong for years ). Eg. event chart is for time&place of some event like wedding (exat moment when newlyweds say "yes"), time of begining of some sport match etc., even our natals are some kind of event chart and in some cases there can be helpfull elections if querent(s) are interested in astrology and/or can set that moment. In some cases it is possible, in some isn't. More examples regarding that: I maybe can choose the best (available) moment to marry or buy something, but I can't set time when my exam will begin So I think that horary is not just event chart, 'cause event charts are including more branches of astrology.
Back to horary (and question if I properly understood your explanation). I'm still sticking the second way you explained (as I in my first post). Why? As Frawley said, we don't make natal chart for time&place when baby is conceived, but when is born. Same is for horary - majority of questions we ask ourselves bother us for some time, we're thinking about it a lot before we make chart and it is unsure when question is definitely "born". So, as you wrote, proper chart will be for the time and place when astrologer received and understood question. Is that what you tried to say or I'm wrong?
And, of course, almost all ancient&medieval authors ("artists" ) said that horary can't give an answer which is in contrast with natal potential of the querent. Eg: question is "will I be rich?", but querent in his natal chart does not have potential to be rich, so in horary chart may be beautiful trine with great reception between significators, but it won't mean that querent will find bunch of money on the street or earn enormus amount of money in short time.
In Lily's (and others) "time" (ie, when they lived, worked and wrote their books) cell phones and internet didn't exist, so maybe they can receive a question only by letter or some other person were just messenger, but only maybe in few cases; I can't remember some example for that kind of q&a and for what time and place they made chart. I think that they made majority of their horary charts when querent directly asked them question, when that querent came to them or met them somewhere and then asked a question.
If I correctly understood your post, that's correct approach, am I right?
I always post a chart for the reading, so others are free to add their points if they want to
I noticed that but I'm not sure if here are others who answers on horary questions, so I asked, just in case
Anyway, thanks for answer
Regards,
Cor