herself
The most readable for me are (also) the most predictable: the PCS commemorative, Thoth, and CBD Marseille. Without a doubt, hands-down, message is gonna get through with these guys.
But then there are others that always surprise me. I never thought the Shining Tribe would be an easy read, but the stories just pour out. Ditto with the International Icon. I actually couldn't stand the art, but heard so much about it I thought I'd give it a go. Wound up being my One Deck Wonder for six months and now I love it.
Like Lark said, readability is such a weird thing. I get drawn to all sorts of decks that turn out to be completely unreadable for me. Wish I could figure out what they have in common so I could avoid blowing cash on decks I don't wind up using!
I'm finding that many beautiful/pretty decks, while I enjoy looking at them, don't often have enough "meat" on them for me to get good readings.
And by "meat" I don't think I mean detail. I mean economy of symbol, I think. But they have to be the right symbols, the right colours, the right composition. And by "right" I don't mean "sanctioned," or "correct," but something less tangible (that I'm describing poorly).
The classics get these things right, and while the more experimental decks sometimes pull off their alternate views, more often than not they don't seem to quite get there.
I'm leaning more and more towards workhorse decks that can pull their weight. Simplicity and clarity have become important features for me.
But then there are others that always surprise me. I never thought the Shining Tribe would be an easy read, but the stories just pour out. Ditto with the International Icon. I actually couldn't stand the art, but heard so much about it I thought I'd give it a go. Wound up being my One Deck Wonder for six months and now I love it.
Like Lark said, readability is such a weird thing. I get drawn to all sorts of decks that turn out to be completely unreadable for me. Wish I could figure out what they have in common so I could avoid blowing cash on decks I don't wind up using!
I'm finding that many beautiful/pretty decks, while I enjoy looking at them, don't often have enough "meat" on them for me to get good readings.
And by "meat" I don't think I mean detail. I mean economy of symbol, I think. But they have to be the right symbols, the right colours, the right composition. And by "right" I don't mean "sanctioned," or "correct," but something less tangible (that I'm describing poorly).
The classics get these things right, and while the more experimental decks sometimes pull off their alternate views, more often than not they don't seem to quite get there.
I'm leaning more and more towards workhorse decks that can pull their weight. Simplicity and clarity have become important features for me.