venicebard said:
Something should be clarified about the Tree that this diagram misconstrues: Da'at is not 3, and the first Sefirah is not 0. The identification of Keter with ain ('nothing' or 'nought') on the one hand means nothing having yet differentiated itself from the One, while on the other hand (really the flip side of the same coin) the Tree itself is said to progress from ain (alef-yod-nun), 'nought', to ani (alef-nun-yod, by transposition of yod and nun), 'I', meaning it maps the differentiation of the individual, the Shekhinah being the Presence of the divine in the individual (or collectively, in individuals).
No, Da'at was originally 4, not 3, and lost that status (in fallen man's psyche) when the lower seven Sefirot underwent the 'breaking of the vessels', which pushed 4 on to the next station, on the male side, and the rest each forward one as well. This is easily understood once the Tree is seen in terms of its origin, as the first ten stations of the round from up to back (aries the head to capricorn or mid-spine, which becomes the knees in the broken-and-extended zodiac): that is, from up, that which is exalted (next to which I am 'nothing', ain), to back towards self (where I am 'I', ani). When the Sefirot are subjected to the maelstrom of time, they 'blur out' into the arcs leading from each of them to the next. In the unmanifest (above the horizon) each arc remains associated with the sign whence it springeth; but in the manifest (where the lower seven Sefirot are), each becomes associated with where it ends up. Since 3 is in the unmanifest and springeth from the 3rd station (gemini), and 4 is in the manifest and ends up in the 5th station (leo), the original 4th station (cancer) is still there but no longer associated (in fallen man's psyche, that is) with any Sefirah, yet we know it to be there and call it Da'at.
“24. Sometimes instead of Keter, Daat is enumerated amongst the sefirot. The
GR"A explained that the inclusion of Keter reflects the inner aspect, while the inclusion of
Daat, reflects the external aspect.
25. This is because the quality of Keter - Great Mercy is not presently revealed. It
will only be fully realized in the world to come. This is indicated by the divine name E-H-EY-
E-H - "I will be," in the future tense, meaning, "I am destined to be" - after the six
thousandth year of creation. Since the conduct toward the world is preparatory to G-d's
ultimate intent of benefiting all, Keter, though concealed, is its underlying and motivating
force, as stated in the Talmud, "Everything that the Merciful One does is for the good."
For this reason, Keter is only counted in respect to the hidden inner aspect but
regarding the external aspect, Daat is counted instead, since it represents that minute
revelation of Keter in this world, on a lesser level. It is, therefore, centered under
Chochmah (which is free of Judgement) and Binah (in which discernments begin to arise)
being a median conduct betwen them.
26. All that is revealed and is known to us of Keter is that this world is preparatory
to its revelation in the world to come. Accordingly, Keter is the root of all present conducts
since it was G-d's original intent to reveal Keter through them - "The last deed being in the
first thought."
27. This explains the above statement that Keter is counted regarding the inner
aspect, but regarding the external aspect, Daat is counted instead, and Keter is only
considered the root. Keter is therefore called
Ayn - Nothingness and
Raysha D'Ayn - The
Primal Nothingness, because we comprehend almost nothing of it. Accordingly, the GR"A
states that, "revelation begins with Chochmah." The order of the sefirot would then be:
Chochmah, Binah, Daat, Chesed, etc.”
End quote from
The Beginning of Wisdom. A Compendium of Primary Kabbalistic Principles
Translated by Rabbi Amiram Markel & Michoel Tzvi Wolkenfeld