Dan1981
Good day!
A little background is probably useful at this point. I had read a number of books on tarot and occult practices/theories. These were interesting and stimulating reads. However I was curious to see what was the source material that these theories & practices were based on. I could be cynical and say that it was a fevered imagination that developed many of these practices but in fairness I believe these authors should have the benefit of the doubt.
Beyond a few books from the 1800's I cannot seem to find many other that relate to tarot.
At the moment from what I have seen I agree with contemporary thought on the origin of tarot. That is to say it was a nobleman's card game that's symbols was originally quite obvious and a product of that society where from it was created - that later had esoteric meaning grafted on to suit the purpose of the decks patron.
I looked at the two other popular theories but on balance the Egyptian and Gypsy while superficially compelling just didn't seem as watertight (especially the Egyptian).
I would love there to be a robust fact based theory explaining a deep and rich past to occult/esoteric tarot beyond the 1400s but honestly I cannot see it at the moment and unless there is some new discoveries made that debunks popular contemporary thought I don't think there will be.
So at this stage I decided that switching to the astrological foundation of the tarot would be a good move to progress further. My hunch is that with a deeper understanding of classical astrology the tarot would have new meaning and present a richer meaning. So I switched to trying to get my hands on as many astrology books as possible Luckily there are many sources going all the way back to 1200AD. (I guess it is a universal preoccupation across the ages to be obsessed by horoscopes )
But much like the tarot research I am now hitting "the wall" I found one plagiarized Latin translation of a Arabic work from 900AD.)
Its been great so far and I have really enjoyed seeing how things have developed. But its like a drug - Once you see one strand you want to go back further and further. like an itch you cannot scratch. I am sure I am not alone is this particular peculiarity.
What I am trying to do is find facsimile copies of older works.
My theory is that unless there was a terrible calamity then these Arabic texts should still be existent somewhere. hopefully available on the net...
Kabalah/I Ching would be another avenue I think that would bring greater perspective, once the astrology angle is exhausted (that should take far longer than the tarot literature.)
If anyone could give me a few pointers/advice & tips I would be grateful.
My major hope is that somewhere there is an Arkkadian / Egyptian resource on astrology.
Sorry for the long post.
A little background is probably useful at this point. I had read a number of books on tarot and occult practices/theories. These were interesting and stimulating reads. However I was curious to see what was the source material that these theories & practices were based on. I could be cynical and say that it was a fevered imagination that developed many of these practices but in fairness I believe these authors should have the benefit of the doubt.
Beyond a few books from the 1800's I cannot seem to find many other that relate to tarot.
At the moment from what I have seen I agree with contemporary thought on the origin of tarot. That is to say it was a nobleman's card game that's symbols was originally quite obvious and a product of that society where from it was created - that later had esoteric meaning grafted on to suit the purpose of the decks patron.
I looked at the two other popular theories but on balance the Egyptian and Gypsy while superficially compelling just didn't seem as watertight (especially the Egyptian).
I would love there to be a robust fact based theory explaining a deep and rich past to occult/esoteric tarot beyond the 1400s but honestly I cannot see it at the moment and unless there is some new discoveries made that debunks popular contemporary thought I don't think there will be.
So at this stage I decided that switching to the astrological foundation of the tarot would be a good move to progress further. My hunch is that with a deeper understanding of classical astrology the tarot would have new meaning and present a richer meaning. So I switched to trying to get my hands on as many astrology books as possible Luckily there are many sources going all the way back to 1200AD. (I guess it is a universal preoccupation across the ages to be obsessed by horoscopes )
But much like the tarot research I am now hitting "the wall" I found one plagiarized Latin translation of a Arabic work from 900AD.)
Its been great so far and I have really enjoyed seeing how things have developed. But its like a drug - Once you see one strand you want to go back further and further. like an itch you cannot scratch. I am sure I am not alone is this particular peculiarity.
What I am trying to do is find facsimile copies of older works.
My theory is that unless there was a terrible calamity then these Arabic texts should still be existent somewhere. hopefully available on the net...
Kabalah/I Ching would be another avenue I think that would bring greater perspective, once the astrology angle is exhausted (that should take far longer than the tarot literature.)
If anyone could give me a few pointers/advice & tips I would be grateful.
My major hope is that somewhere there is an Arkkadian / Egyptian resource on astrology.
Sorry for the long post.