Melanchollic
I voted for
No. Keep standards in His Res; speculation can be addressed in Talking Tarot,
though I'd actually like to see much stricter standards. (There has been a bit too much 'Pink Slime' on the lunch plates 'round here recently. )
I think a "speculation" section would work better under the general "Tarot" umbrella, separate from the rather general "Talking Tarot" section... but definitely not under the "Tarot History & Iconography" umbrella, nor as a sub-section of the "Historical Research" section. Speculation is not research!!
No. Keep standards in His Res; speculation can be addressed in Talking Tarot,
though I'd actually like to see much stricter standards. (There has been a bit too much 'Pink Slime' on the lunch plates 'round here recently. )
I think a "speculation" section would work better under the general "Tarot" umbrella, separate from the rather general "Talking Tarot" section... but definitely not under the "Tarot History & Iconography" umbrella, nor as a sub-section of the "Historical Research" section. Speculation is not research!!