Okay, I'll bite.
Some times it doesnt help me the language. I was living many years in Germany. I am a good faith man, but some times i like to play and laugh, i like the jokes, that was one of the reason that i liked so much Aleister, Osho and that kind of Masters who had humor. I am serious though and open to learn.
There is a vast difference between Crowley and Osho. I won't go into how vast, since I am not familiar enough with Osho, but I am surprised you lump them together like that, humor notwithstanding.
By the way i downloaded Duquettes book and it didnt impress me. I will need more days to learn that, but already i came to a conclusion. I think Milos book it's a rewriting of Aleister Crowleys Thoths book. He makes simpler some things, but he doesnt reveal something special for the degrees. In a way i felt that also as a advertisment of the order, especially in the point which refers to that secret of sexual magic in that certain degree it's like to say us "guys, join us to learn that, we will not tell you". We are living in 21th century, there is no reason for such secrecy.
Let's ignore the illegal download for a moment and go on to the next part. I recommended that book to you because language barrier or not, it was clear to me that you were missing some vital pieces of the Thoth puzzle, and I thought that book would fill you in. I don't know why it didn't impress you, as I thought it wouid at least order your thoughts and ideas. Your questions betray a lack of such order, and as such it is difficult to answer them, seeing as you lack the syntax with which to understand the answers. Ignorance is a fault only if it goes unremedied, and if you ask very basic Thelemic questions, I doubt anyone will write long essays about Thelema just to answer you. Whether you were impressed or not, you need to do some homework.
Secondly, DuQuette admits freely to trying not to insert too much of himself into the book, instead attempting to present relevant material in an easier, more approachable way. Again, you need this, and I'm not being condescending without reason.
You need this.
As to the third point, some things cannot be taught, but must be experienced. I myself was sorely, and in retrospect quite deservedly, rebuked by a member here for not understanding this. I am not a member or any order, but after understanding what I was told, I went out into the world and played with it, and the revelations were quite astounding. My understanding is far from perfect, but DuQuette is under no obligation to reveal everything he knows in order to satisfy mere intellectual curiosity. If you wish to practice magick, there are ample sources to help you with that, but DuQuette didn't write a magick book, he wrote a Tarot book, and an introductory one at that. He never sought to replace the Book of Thoth, which, to be honest, it is quite evident you don't really understand. You pick small snippets and ask about them, without knowing the bigger picture. That is why your questions either go unanswered or answered clumsily.
Aleister Crowley was the first who revealed some "secrets". In other masonic systems, there have been published all the rituals in details.
Same goes for these rituals and initiations. But without preparatory study, they won't help you much. What would you do with them? Invoke Babalon, the woman of your dreams?
By the way, since we are analyzing Babalons subject, the great occultist and kabbalist Elifas Levi writes in that book that i have read that Babalon is the symbol of evil. He writes "The seven head beast represents in the St.John symbolism the material, competitive denial of bright Seven whereas the Whore of Babylon represents the same as to the denial of the Woman with 12 stars wearing the Sun. So i see learning too much all these years that the truth is very relative.
And this is the example of your lack of knowledge. Levi's Babalon and Crowley's aren't the same, and convey perhaps the same ideas, but differently. The truth really is relative, but you need some more work.