MareSaturni
Our posts crossed, but you seem to use predictive methods the same way that I do. Selecting for definite and specific issues rather than as some general description of the future.
Yes. In the past I have been guilty of "overusing" my oracles with frequent readings for myself and with very vague questions, that ultimately only made me confused and pretty much ruined the whole experience of reading for a while. Now I have learnt . And of course I never had the intention of repeating the mistake with Astrology!
Modern Astrology sees the chart as something of a map of the mind. We need to see the chart as a whole to understand the drives and motivations of a person and their perceptions of the outside world. Contradictions and conflicts are seen as giving some indication of the drives and motivational reactions of the person.
Traditional Astrology sees the chart as more than this. Yes it shows the intrinsic temperament and behaviour of the person but it also shows not only their perception of the real world but also the real world itself, in so far as it affects that person. Thus the ruler of the tenth does not so much show their perception of their mother as their mother herself and her interaction with them. That is there's less emphasis on the depth psychology and more emphasis on reality (and I stress the relative terms here, I'm not saying that Modern approaches have nothing to do with reality or that Traditional approaches are devoid of psychology).
I like that about the Traditional Astrology... sometimes I have the impression that the books I have focus a lot on the characteristic of the person, but do not show that what the same planets and aspects could represent in terms of events and situations. From what you have told us, Traditional Astrology has a better way of more balanced view of the chart, not so focused on the individual, but also analyzing what surrounds him. "No man is an island". We are a result of both our potentials and temperament and the reality that surrounds us.
I have been looking for books on Traditional Astrology here where I live, but so far I have not been lucky. I am unable to buy it from abroad from the time being, so I am relying on books about Modern/Psychological Astrology.
Once we start to determine rulerships, exaltations, and other adjunct modifications to each planet, things become complex. Rather than start off a chart reading with all of this baggage to contend with why not do it the simple way?
For example, MERCURY represents how you communicate, write, local travel preferences and activities, your thoughts and how you both perceive people/events and how you organize facts and memories. It's house provides a focus area of life where these thoughts and communications are emphasized, the sign might suggest the tone or style you apply to expressing these Mercury activities.
Then go on to each of the other planets. Just using these statements will provide a fairly clear idea of the core meanings of the chart as a whole, of you as a whole person. Where there is contraction, there is a personality wrinkle that makes you unique and which you will find a way to fold into your life.
Note, we haven't talked of aspects yet, nor how close or loose they may be. We haven't talked about all of the classical and medeival twists and turns that were used to refine and expand a chart's meaning to overcome the presence of only a few planets that could be worked with. Simple is the way to start. Dave
Thank you Dave! I think I'll do this exercise with the example charts I have, only the basic Planet/House/Sign thing, plus essential dignities. When I am comfortable with it, I'll start incorporating the major aspects.
I have no idea what the medieval twists and turns are, I am still in search for a good book about the History of Astrology!
At a more serious level, eventually you will need to make a decision about what levels of complexity to accept and which complexities to reject. That will be influenced not only by the quantity of complexity you want to allow but also the quality - that is some complexities may appeal to your approach others may just seem like making the simple become difficult to no good purpose. I think Dave and I would agree on keeping things as simple as is consistent with getting the results you are looking for, or are at least willing to settle for. We might disagree on which complexities to choose and incorporate but that's not really a major issue for you, as you have to settle on your own approach and this will change and develop over time. So nice small steps to begin with but once you are happy with those steps, then is the time to consider adding some complexity. Note I said consider, there will come a point sooner or later when the answer to that consideration will be to reject the additional complexity. You might well end up simply content that you've got the basics and not wish to go further, or that you are able to read a natal chart to your satisfaction, whilst recognising that there's a lot more that you could incorporate if only you had the time and inclination. It's not an all or nothing scenario.
I want to learn as much as possible! I'd like to learn enough to interpret a chart & its complexities with some confidence, and to be able to do transits and progressions. Above all, I wish to know enough in order to choose what I want to incorporate in my practice, and not discard anything out of ignorance.
I understood that Dave's simplification works as a way to learn better the nature of the planets and houses, which is the knowledge that helps you to understand well the aspects and others things. I did not assume that a decent analysis of a chart could be limited to it. I suppose I should keep it simple until I'm comfortable with the Houses and Planets and how they work
I know the basic part well, but I still need to 'ingrain' this knowledge into my brain, so it'll become more 'intuitive' and I don't have to spend 5 minutes recalling this information every time I look at a chart. But it takes study and practice to develop this mental agility, I guess. I think that some simplification will help me with this part, as long as I don't limit myself to it.