RViewer said:
He seemed to feel strongly that we all have an intimate and direct connection to the source if we cultivate it. We do not need to give our energy and belief over to someone more powerful than us for them to use our energy for us.
I also have a fascination with the Armarna period, and I have to say that I have never seen it discribed like this.
I have always felt that Akenaton was an egomaniac.
He destroyed the other gods and their priesthoods because they had more power than the monarchy.
So he destroyed them, making the Aten the only god.
Then, in the worship of the Aten, the only way for people to connect to that god was through Akenaten himself.
In effect he was the only way to the only god, and every one worshipped him.
Note that on all the reliefs the sun disc, (the aten) only holds the life giving ankhs to the faces of the royal family, never to anyone else.
It was also Akenaten himself who devised the new worship of the Aten, and he himself that conducted it, replacing the priesthood and combining that office with the monarchy into one person, himself.
It is Akenaten who is carved onto the tombs of all the courtiers, replacing the older gods and their priests with himself.
I could go on. I could go on for ages about the Armarna period. It has always fascinated me.
But I think that everyone sees in it what they want.
Freud saw Moses in the monotheistic aspects of Atenism.
Velicovsky saw Oedipus.
I see an egomaniac.
You see someone who seems quite altruistic.
If I had a time machine I'd go back and find out what he was really like...
Back to the topic...
Lotus.
I always thought it was a yoni (for want of a better word).