I have a question. Yoav, in the you-tube videos, it looks to me like you separated out the 22 trumps before you had your interviewers draw a card. Is that right? Do you read this deck with only the trumps?
hi debra - in short - i just sent you the cards, when you get them you will notice that the order is different than the standard - first the 22 majors, then the 4 aces, then the 16 courts, then the 36 numbers. this is because i try to base my methodology on the card designs. the designs of these four groups are very different, so i treat them differently. each may have its own uses, advantages and strengths.
as for the trumps - these are the heart of the tarot, and from jodorowsky i learned that a complete reading (1-2 hours sometimes) can be done with only 3 cards from the 22, provided it is marseille. as i do it today, i dont determine the roles of the cards beforehand (e.g. past present and future etc). instead i try to see the complete picture, and then understand the role of each card, object or figure. if you do it attentively and examine the details, the flow of lines and surfaces, the body language, the position of the figures and their relations - you can spend hours doing it, and still be surprised in the next time you see the same cards. they are amazingly rich.
so, many tiimes i do this - a basic spread, 3 cards from the 22, left to right. as i understand, many french readers do the same with marseille cards.
in complex situations i use the whole deck of 78 - but in a way that i end up with 3 of the 22 on top, and minor cards under them to give a story leading to the main cards. so it is an extension of the basic spread.
as for the 16 figures - i am discovering them just now, because they have no clear symbology, it is their human nature which they express. but this depends a lot on the composition, which previous versions did not notice as they were looking for something else. in fact if you compare cbd cards to other versions, the difference (emotional and visual) in the 16 figures is the most significant. btw, as jodorowsky is not interested in them, their design in the jodo-camoin deck was done mainly by philippe himself. i know that because i asked jodorowsky about them.
as for the tv show - well, this has its own rules. it needs to be visual and clear, with short and focused messages ("syncs"). so the best way to do it for me is one card of the 22, which can catch the camera's attention and give an impression of the richness and mystery of the cards (imagine that i would draw something like the 8 of coins.. the camera goes to sleep - visually dull, unless you look into the fine details which is not possible in a tv show).
well, this is the short answer.. i will post a description of my method of reading eith the full deck soon (excuse me, writing in english is not natural for me).
btw in the tv clip you linked to i was still using the jodo-camoin deck. the following was done just now with the cbd (still in hebrew). it starts with the philosophy of time and the mystery of numbers in nature, but then (4:25) we switch to tarot and the devil card.. and you can see how the emotional tone of the contact with the interviewer changes. of course this is the seductively anarchistic and wildly alive diable de marseille, we would not feel the same with the dark and evil RWS devil..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nbq_mhjp0s