Darth MI
There's a theory about the nature of elements and modes I found online.
Basically it states although a sign like Virgo may be mutuable, Virgo may come off as fixed since its Earth sign until you study the sign into proportion with the other Earth signs. Scorpio may be fixed, but it has mutuable elements such as transformation since its a water sign.
Here's the overall theory.
All Earth signs are somewhat fixed because of the rigid nature of Earth element.
All Water signs are somewhat mutuable because of water shifting its shape to match its surrounding environment.
All Fire are cardinal to an extent because of the extroverted and aggressive nature of flames.
Air signs go into extreme depending on the mode. Aquarius is stubborn at its core, Libra is outstanding at leadership, and Gemini is fastest in changing itself to adapt to the environment.
How does this theory match traditional astrology dogma? Its quite common on an internet searchbar to find this theory and even modern books state it (or at least imply it).
Basically it states although a sign like Virgo may be mutuable, Virgo may come off as fixed since its Earth sign until you study the sign into proportion with the other Earth signs. Scorpio may be fixed, but it has mutuable elements such as transformation since its a water sign.
Here's the overall theory.
All Earth signs are somewhat fixed because of the rigid nature of Earth element.
All Water signs are somewhat mutuable because of water shifting its shape to match its surrounding environment.
All Fire are cardinal to an extent because of the extroverted and aggressive nature of flames.
Air signs go into extreme depending on the mode. Aquarius is stubborn at its core, Libra is outstanding at leadership, and Gemini is fastest in changing itself to adapt to the environment.
How does this theory match traditional astrology dogma? Its quite common on an internet searchbar to find this theory and even modern books state it (or at least imply it).