Personally, I do not see any direct correlation between Kabalistic explanations and some early Tarot decks - except, and this is possibly important, in its possible role in stabilising iconographic details and ordering pattern in what has come to be referred to as the Marseille deck.
For example, I do not see correlations either as depicted in separate but possibly connected imagery on 12-13th century Cathedrals and the Kabbalah, nor have I found such on such decks as the Vieville or even the Noblet (except indirectly), but have personally found Filipas's thesis (in his Alphabetic Masquerade) of explanatory force in accounting for a definite patterning.
Thus, though I have previously found wanting the Kabalistically oriented remarks of De Gebelin, Comte de M*, Levi, the GD and its derivatives, perhaps an intrinsic Kabalistic connection to a pattern in the process of stabilisation does 'explain' its peculiar image-shapes and ordering.
I have therefore voted - against the grain - 'Yes', though with the qualifying comments I make above.