DaisyDragonfly
And in my post, I said that thinking of them as pentacles has added to my understanding of the suit. So does thinking of them as coins. Or stones. Or clocks. Or whatever. This was in response to a suggestion that a potentially objectionable symbol should be erased from the tarot lexicon.
Tarot has developed; their historical meaning is just one facet. A valuable, shining, fundamental facet... but, in the face of modern redrawings, something to be built upon.
Of course, it's all hypothetical. Pentacles aren't going anywhere: RWS is built upon the Western Esoteric tradition, and we're the richer for it. And, the original poster has been answered: the pentacle is not a one-note symbol and, if it proves to be an immutable issue, other decks provide suitable alternatives.
Tarot has developed; their historical meaning is just one facet. A valuable, shining, fundamental facet... but, in the face of modern redrawings, something to be built upon.
Of course, it's all hypothetical. Pentacles aren't going anywhere: RWS is built upon the Western Esoteric tradition, and we're the richer for it. And, the original poster has been answered: the pentacle is not a one-note symbol and, if it proves to be an immutable issue, other decks provide suitable alternatives.