dadsnook2000
Even more food for thought
The Uranian Astrologers use 8 trans-Pluto "planets" -- hypothetical, discovered by observation and trail and error. Witte started this development, Ebertin extended it somewhat, and now there are many independent "Uranian" schools. These were formulated and defined in meaning and by ephemeris position during and between the two World Wars of the 19th century. Many would say that this is ridiculous BUT they appear valid in practice and can add a great deal to a chart reading. Recently a new body was sighted and has a position near the hypothetical Cupido (first of the trans-Pluto planets; Cupido, Hades, Zeus, Kronos, Apollon, Admeios, Vulcanus and Poseidon). \
*** As for pre-discovery resonance of people's charts with Uranus, Neptune and Pluto there have been quite a few published although I no longer have that in my files.
*** Do points in space have significance. Well, mid-point practice and theory -- as initiated by Bonitio (?) in Italy (1500's) -- can be said to be points in space -- BUT THEY WORK. I can accept that they commonly used interpretations for Uranus, Neptune and/or Pluto could be different. Edgar Cayce turns Saturns "imposed limitations" around to be "areas where you choose not to grow." Donald Bradley (a Sidereal astrologer and contemporary of Cyril Fagan) links Neptune to "large crowds" and "unclear situations" rather than theater, media, deception and illusion. Fagan has often shown Pluto to be associated with "irrevocable change" and Ebertin with "intense power applied." This is a great discussion. Dave.
The Uranian Astrologers use 8 trans-Pluto "planets" -- hypothetical, discovered by observation and trail and error. Witte started this development, Ebertin extended it somewhat, and now there are many independent "Uranian" schools. These were formulated and defined in meaning and by ephemeris position during and between the two World Wars of the 19th century. Many would say that this is ridiculous BUT they appear valid in practice and can add a great deal to a chart reading. Recently a new body was sighted and has a position near the hypothetical Cupido (first of the trans-Pluto planets; Cupido, Hades, Zeus, Kronos, Apollon, Admeios, Vulcanus and Poseidon). \
*** As for pre-discovery resonance of people's charts with Uranus, Neptune and Pluto there have been quite a few published although I no longer have that in my files.
*** Do points in space have significance. Well, mid-point practice and theory -- as initiated by Bonitio (?) in Italy (1500's) -- can be said to be points in space -- BUT THEY WORK. I can accept that they commonly used interpretations for Uranus, Neptune and/or Pluto could be different. Edgar Cayce turns Saturns "imposed limitations" around to be "areas where you choose not to grow." Donald Bradley (a Sidereal astrologer and contemporary of Cyril Fagan) links Neptune to "large crowds" and "unclear situations" rather than theater, media, deception and illusion. Fagan has often shown Pluto to be associated with "irrevocable change" and Ebertin with "intense power applied." This is a great discussion. Dave.