FaeryGodmother
firemaiden said:I suppose Tarot can go mainstream to the degree that it can be divorced from "fortune-telling"...
But "fortune-telling" is mainstream. Or at least the art of prediction is. We have weather forecasts every night on the news. That is backed by years of scientific training and complicated jargon that most people (at least most people I know) don't truly understand. We could learn about it easily enough, or at least the basics of it by looking it up on the net or in an encyclopedia, (or trying to remember high school lessons that for a large portion of us are highly outdated). There are so many predictions in "mainstream" life its not funny. And we aren't surprised when they aren't always right- but we make decisions based on them anyway. Personally I don't think theres a difference between fortune-telling and predicting other than connotation.
Anyway my rather long winded point is that "fortune-telling" or predictions ARE mainstream- very much so, from the weather to market predictions, projected sales etc etc. All these things backed up by nothing more than numbers and previous experience.
All card readers know what they know from experience and learning. I think in order for tarot to go mainstream in the way implied by this thread, it needs to be seperated from "new age" in the sense of being flighty, unprovable and practiced by charlatans. But because it would be very difficult if not impossible to back up the art of tarot reading with double blind repeatable experiments, it will remain in the pile marked "not scientific". Because its not scientific or religious then it falls out of the two "mainstream" acceptable piles.
I think if there were high profile and well respected tarot readers, they would be able to change public perception in the way that high profile psychics have altered public perception of psychics.