The cynic in me always gets suspicious when a new member comes on board and immediately takes a moral high ground without first getting a feeling for the general tone of a community. However, since Tarot fits into a category where people get wary regarding intent, I can certainly understand it.
I have been reading "professionally" for over a year now. Hard to believe sometimes that I get paid for something I have loved doing for so many years, but the fact remains that there is a market for it. And I have been on both sides. Over the years I have gladly shoveled over my money for readings and have come across many styles - some good, some bad, some atrocious. But the fact remained, it was my decision to part with my money.
When I started doing readings for the bookshop, I felt a tinge of guilt taking money. But after my first day, I got over it. I realized two things - first, it takes an extraordinary amount of energy to do a reading. And if someone goes out of his/her way to pay me to do it, then why not accept the money. Secondly, in the atmosphere I work in, 90% of the people coming to me do so expecting me to be a shoulder to cry on - a sort of counselor. Now I have had my share of psychology courses in my time, but I am no certified counselor. But I do feel in tune with the human psyche and because of my life experiences feel like I can identify with the needs of most of my seekers. So my feeling is that if I can help someone, why not?
Comparing Tarot to religious contributions is irrelevant as Marion astutely pointed out. Most religious offerings are done because of duty. Tarot readings fall into two categories - those who seek it out in a recreational situation (such as fairs) or those who are looking for guidance in their lives. If someone feels strongly that you should not be paid for such, then A) do not pay if you are a seeker or B) do not accept money if you are a reader.
Dan