.traveller. said:
So how would this change in your view if, say, we added a third card like:
Queen of Swords -> World/9 of Cups, or
maybe 9 of Cups/World <-Knight of Wands
I think we are looking at this in a similar way.
From an elemental standpoint, you have the QS representing Air followed by Earth and Water. Air and Earth are enemies, weakening one another. So I'd say something about the Queen (her overall demeanor, her sharp tongue, her penchant for being alone and/or in control) is having a negative effect on her ability to reach the fulfillment of the World.
With the KnW as Fire following Water and Earth, my view departs from the traditional Golden Dawn view of Elemental Dignities. In the GD tradition, the Water and Fire cards neutralize each other, leaving just the Earth card. That doesn't make sense to me, so I look at the interactions between the central card (Earth in this case) and each of the flanking cards (Water to the left and Fire to the right). Earth and Water are friendly so they strengthen each other as I've already discussed. Earth and Fire are neutral. (Another place I differ from the GD is that I don't automatically assume that neutral interactions are friendly. Neutral interactions can be neutral, friendly or unfriendly depending on the cards involved.) In the case of the World and the KnW, I prob would see the interaction as unfriendly because the hotheadedness and/or impatience of the Knight would be at odds with the "in due time" nature of the World. Although the Knight does bring action to the two passive cards, it's not the kind of action that moves the situation forward, if that makes sense.
Rodney