shaveling
I expect that back then, if you wanted to symbolize "this intelligence of 'gut feelings' by skilled stoneworkers" by putting a face on the belly, you might as well make it the devil, because that's the way everyone would read that image anyway. Just as today, if you showed a man with horns and a barbed tail, folks would read the image as the devil, no matter what the artist may have wanted to say by using those attributes.ihcoyc said:But, then, why ascribe this to the Devil?
My own feeling is that the card really did represent the Devil, who probably stood for all three enemies of the soul: the world*, the flesh, and the devil. And the reason for the extra face(s) is that that was one of the standard ways of representing the Devil at the time. That doesn't address the question of antlers vs. goat's horns, though. The antlers make me wonder how the devil character was costumed in plays and parades in the days when the TdM was new.
.............................
*This means "worldly values" and doesn't have anything to do with Trump XXI.