Sidhe-Ra
What, the review that was written months before the deck actually came out?
Sure. That was fair.
Sure. That was fair.
I have subsequently read more threads and the important one about reviewing decks in the forum at all, and I think that these are murkier waters than I would wish to tread.
Surely you agree that a review should be done once the product actually exists by someone who has actually seen and used the product?
And today's phrase is....
am I bothered?
What I think of that, is of no consequence. Although I was a member then, I was not active in the forums at that time, so there's no point in igniting that match again.
However I do feel that, regardless of who this person is (as I said, I only found out about his existence two days ago), even if he were Hitler, 30+ pages of ragging on anyone makes for dull threads, and is hardly a worthy use of anyone's time.
However I do feel that, regardless of who this person is (as I said, I only found out about his existence two days ago), even if he were Hitler, 30+ pages of ragging on anyone makes for dull threads, and is hardly a worthy use of anyone's time.