The Dodal is a great deck.
For *me*, it is one of the most important in existance. I have a love/hate relationship with it. I use it in my historical studies. When I come across any question about the iconography of a card, I pull out my Dodal, Conver, and Vieville.. and Noblet scans, and start comparing. I've come to believe that we can classify the the Dodal as an earlier, "TdM I" style deck, and the Conver as a later "TdM II" style deck. To me, that means that if you're looking for as close a copy as we have to what the earliest TdM looked like, a published reproduction.. then we're talking about the Dodal!
But I have the unpopular belief that Dodal is a poorly drawn deck. I find lots of little details I suspect are "missing" from it that I'm guessing were probably there on better versions of the style; and there are lots of details that are poorly drawn, but trick me into wondering if they were intentional and if there is any meaning.
Even if the Noblet, probably my favorite TdM, were photo-reproduced today, I'm not sure I would think it a more important deck. The Dodal in many ways seems like a missing link to me, it connects to the Conver, Noblet, Besancons, Sforza Castle.. and other decks probably that I can't think of off the top of my head.
For studying the history of Tarot, history of the Tdm, it's a very important deck. For reading? Many TdM readers I know love it as well.
I certainly DO hope they republish it, and the Noblet for that matter, and a Payen if there is a complete/near complete one available.