What I want to say is that we rarely - almost never - can find the RIGHT way to do something. Any project express in a direction that we control only in a certain way... and that i's unique of that single creative process, unity of elements.
There had been thousand possible elven decks that we could been creating... and yet only one came to life. To answer certain questions, to resonate with certain tastes.
Said so... I really understand how people like and dislike decks. It's the reason there are so many decks. And also, I realize we need to be especially critic on the things we love most.
It would be really a pleasure for me, it it would be possible, to have the AT community look at a deck creation process.
And for every choice we make, there is something that's gained and something that's lost.
For us the CG is itself an experiment. Can people relate to that kind of art? Can the added depth of textures and realistic images, lights and atmosphere, make up for that artificiality one can feel in posture and human expression? I still don't know.
(and I sort of like the question).
Anyway, still my personal opinion, even as an insider I like the deck.
I like the story Mark weaved into the images. I like the structure. And I like the feeling... the solarity/purity the cards express.
As for the Empress... the cards perfectly express the meaning of the card under the structure. The deck has been created as "journey of the hero" tale. The Empress is seen backward... it is the loss of the mother-figure, the leaving of the nest. As the Emperor is the loss of the father figure. The Hero then journey on its own, looking for freedom, identity, knowledge, maturity, before getting back home (and the Empress and Emperor are rejoined with the Hero in the Judgment card).
Every deck shapes the cards in its own way. As we "shape" the deck when we use it.
an off-topic ric
p.s.
yes: book
160 pages