Karnoeffel and the Origin of Tarot

Huck

Hi,

Karnoeffel might be a word, that not everybody knows, so I give hear some basics about it:

Karnoeffel is the oldest known card play, it was noted first in 1426. More than 30 notes from 15th/16th century are known, also it is mentioned under the name Keyserspiel (the identity or relationship between them is given by Bishop Geiler in 1496). As far we do know the rules, the card play used personifications, which they attributed to normal playing cards: The trump-Jack was the Karnöffel, the trump-6 the Pope, the trump-2 the Emperor, trump-7 the Devil. Figures, we do know from the Tarot-game, which under the name Trionfi probably developed since 1441.
This context makes it plausible, that Karnoeffel took influence upon the development, just by developing the sense of players for special cards, which by motif could be added to the normal game.
From 1423 we do hear of an Italian Imperatori-deck, which consisted of 8 cards, which probably was added to the normal deck (56, 52, 48 cards) as later the 22 trumps were added to the Tarocchi-game.

Imperatori is the Italian word for Keyser. Although here the same word is used, one must assume, that the normal development of Karnoeffel or Keyserspiel happened without additional cards, one must assume, that the Italian version Imperatori went another way and painted special figures inside the card game on special cards. Probably this development, "add some special cards", did lead to the development of Trionfi decks, probably in Ferrara 1441/1442, as we experience, that the production of Imperatori decks stopped, when Trionfi-decks became popular (around 1450 - the development is mainly only observable in Ferrara).

The early Trionfi decks probably had only 14 or 16 trumps, organised in structures of 5 suits as 5x14 or 5x16-variants, which later by unknown movements developed into 4x14+22-versions.

The origin of the name Karnoeffel is a riddle. There is a new suggestion:

http://trionfi.com/0/c/05

Material to the Imperatori-decks and Karnöffel (beside other material):

http://trionfi.com/0/e

Material to the 5x14-theory:

http://trionfi.com/0/f/11/
http://http://trionfi.com/0/c/35

also http://trionfi.com/0/e/

with special worth to document 16 from 1457, which clearly states, that 2 produced decks have 70 cards instead of perhaps expected 78 cards.

The rules of the Karnoeffel game are only very rudimentary known from documents around 1450 and 1496, really usable descriptions are found in 18th century, and that exploration show variants with some similarities. Karnoeffel-games (various variants) are still played, compare John McLeods's site, often in North European countries:

http://pagat.com

in the Suisse a Fastnachts-Verein with the name Karnoeffel exists since late 19th century with traditional card-playing. A good report is given in German language at

http://www.landsknechtsrotte.de/portal/k-einleitung.html

another source is Michael Dummett, Game of Tarot.


*****
edited 2009 / links updated
 

Cerulean

What an excellent explanation...

The D'Estensi of Ferarra are getting more 21st century fame! Yes, yes, yippee...
I wondered about the reflective development of card games and other things from Emporer Sigismundo's visits and support to Niccolo and subsequent political maneurings in Ferarra...it explains to me why things such as the Mantegna of 1470 and triumphi verses from Matteo Maria Boiardo suddenly had a delicious vogue.
I had a delicious thrill this weekend when I read in a tarot timeline:

1442...the acquisition of 'triumph cards for the knights" is documented in the REgistro dei Mandi of the Este ducy. THis is the first known document about the ludis triuophorum, which become famous over the subsequent centuries as the game of tarot cards. During the fifteenth centuryu, the luds riompharun became one of the most widespread card games in the courts of northern italy. What remains of the thirty or so illuminated packs conserved in public and private collections in Europe and the United States undoubtedly refers to the Visconti Sforza family of Milan and Este family in Ferarra. (Egyptian Tarot, Berti/Gonard)...
Of course, this might be an eye to their newer sometime 2004 gilded reproduction of the D'Estensi tarocchi that R. Minetti referred to in quick mention recently...
But Mari the Ferrara fan is happy...


original posting:
...one must assume, that the Italian version Imperatori went another way and painted special figures inside the card game on special cards. Probably this development, "add some special cards", did lead to the development of Trionfi decks, probably in Ferrara 1441/1442, as we experience, that the production of Imperatori decks stopped, when Trionfi-decks became popular (around 1450 - the development is mainly only observable in Ferrara).
 

Eberhard

Huck, the only information I have is from the book: Detleff Hoffmann: Schweizer Spielkarten 1, 1998, ISBN 3-907066-27-8. It contains a 3 pages section about Das Karnöffel- oder Kaiserspiel:
page 10, page 11, page 12 (German text only)
 

Huck

Eberhard said:
Huck, the only information I have is from the book: Detleff Hoffmann: Schweizer Spielkarten 1, 1998, ISBN 3-907066-27-8. It contains a 3 pages section about Das Karnöffel- oder Kaiserspiel:
page 10, page 11, page 12 (German text only)

Thanks for the article. Interesting to hear that Hoffmann in 1998 thinks the entry from 1367 Bern reliable. Also interesting, that it had been considered that 1572 is the oldest Suisse date for Keyserspiel - although already Bischof Geiler presents the view, that Karnoeffel and Keyserspiel (or Ludus caesarum) are identical.

Well, that's the problem with the playing card books: they didn't
reach to present documents in a form, where you really can see the source, so any conclusion is blocked by "half-information". What Ross and autorbis have tried to do with the term Trionfi (see

http://trionfi.com/0/e/

) must be done for other document regions too, otherwise error and misconcepts, wrong conclusions etc.. are unavoidable. Of course, a lot of work.

Does the article present a good view at the Suisse playing card development?
 

Eberhard

> Does the article present a good view at the Suisse playing card development?

At least it was jointly published by the Museum zu Allerheiligen and the Cartophilia Helvetica as an academic contribution, so it seems to be the official point of view over here.

Interestingly enough, part of the book consists of an introductory article by Arne Jönsson, University of Lund, SE, who concentrates on publishing the complete translation of the 300pp. Latin text of Johannes von Rheinfelden.
 

Huck

"Interestingly enough, part of the book consists of an introductory article by Arne Jönsson, University of Lund, SE, who concentrates on publishing the complete translation of the 300pp. Latin text of Johannes von Rheinfelden."

**** Is it a long article?
 

Ross G Caldwell

I found this bibliography -

2.2. Playing cards

- "Der Ludus cartularum moralisatus des Johannes von Rheinfelden", in: Schweizer
Spielkarten 1: Die Anfänge im 15. und 16. Jahrhundert. Schaffhausen 1998, pp. 135-
147.

- John of Rheinfelden, Ludus cartularum (editio princeps, in preparation)

http://www.lu.se/klass/klasspr/latinschol/arne.html
 

Eberhard

Ross, that's exactly what we are talking about!
 

Huck

Probably the article is the best to the theme at the moment. Autorbis took contact to Arne Jönssen, but didn't reach much. It would be good to see this article.