She was talking about AC's approach.
I've been extremely fortunate in my 'conditioning' , which is why I totally understand what Valiente is saying even though yes, she does polarize it a bit. I think people who have really experienced love+sex energy tend to see the energies very differently than people who haven't.
Of course they do ! Like any experience.
Yes there is a core of similarity between many different ways of creating sexual energy, and I think what people tend to argue is that they are using/extracting that universal core energy as a 'pure' form, for their magical means, however or with whomever it was created.
If she was talking about Crowley then it just makes her comments worse and are even more clearly a matter of her conditioning.
Because, what IS she talking about re Crowley; An 8th or 9th degree working, an MMM Tantra rite (and you were the only person talking about tantra? You must have missed my earlier post ?) , some aversion he wanted to get over, some perversion he couldn't get over, some silly hopeless love affair where he looses it in infatuation ( which he confesses a few times in his writings) ... all, in one way or another he used for 'magical purposes'. Its all in his writings.