firemaiden
I was quite surprised, looking at this marvelous little book, "The Art of Tarot" by Christine Olsen (1995) to finally see a full colour reproduction of the Ercole d'este Fool -- at first glance I thought it was the unusual Charles VI Fool, just going by the skimpy underpants, until I noticed the little people pulling them down! A very funny card! I guess it might be considered a little X-rated.
It seems that prior to the little doggie biting the Fools pants off, we had this? Does that mean "em-bare-ass-ing exposure of private parts" is the most important and most ancient aspect of this card?
(A larger version of the card from the Yale site can be seen here.)
It seems that prior to the little doggie biting the Fools pants off, we had this? Does that mean "em-bare-ass-ing exposure of private parts" is the most important and most ancient aspect of this card?
(A larger version of the card from the Yale site can be seen here.)