Barleywine
There is an ongoing debate about whether tarot - essentially a story-telling medium - is effective for giving predictive answers of the simplest type - "yes" or "no." Some say no, it isn't. Some just use one-card draws for this, which I suppose is fine if you have an inflexible, predetermined "yes/no/maybe" meaning for every card (some are obvious, others not so much). But it seems to be devoid of any latitude for more insightful interpretation, like "why" or "how" that particular answer was arrived at instead of another.
Mary K. Greer has an interesting option on her site from a 1955 magazine article by Irys Vorel: https://marygreer.wordpress.com/2008/06/02/yes-no-advice-oracle/, but it's a little less to-the-point than I've been looking for.
What I'm thinking is that a three-card line should be sufficient for this purpose, with the center - or "focus" - card as the "answer" card. I would then use elemental dignities from the other two to see if the center card is strengthened or weakend by them, making the suggested answer more or less likely. The inherent nature of the center card would of course still be the primary indicator, but I like the inflection provided by the "modifiers." The nature of those cards could also shed light on the ease or difficulty the focus card displays in producing an unambiguous answer.
As you can see, I don't think anything about tarot is cut-and-dried.
Mary K. Greer has an interesting option on her site from a 1955 magazine article by Irys Vorel: https://marygreer.wordpress.com/2008/06/02/yes-no-advice-oracle/, but it's a little less to-the-point than I've been looking for.
What I'm thinking is that a three-card line should be sufficient for this purpose, with the center - or "focus" - card as the "answer" card. I would then use elemental dignities from the other two to see if the center card is strengthened or weakend by them, making the suggested answer more or less likely. The inherent nature of the center card would of course still be the primary indicator, but I like the inflection provided by the "modifiers." The nature of those cards could also shed light on the ease or difficulty the focus card displays in producing an unambiguous answer.
As you can see, I don't think anything about tarot is cut-and-dried.