Chiriku
The other two big threads on this deck deal with the creation of the original deck and the subsequent production of the deck by Tarot Connections.
I would like this thread to focus on your impressions, a few years later, of using and reading with this deck.
I will start off with usage and post later about reading/content.
The major usage issues implicated here are the small size of the cards and the card stock. As to the former, I am surprisingly amenable to the deck despite my strong preference for large sized images. I think this is because the images take up so much of the card, with only a very narrow white border.
Second issue of card stock is not so favorable.
I saved the first time use of these for October and even in this lower-humidity (for where I live) season, it's hard not to notice the extreme softness of the cardstock. I've never felt cards like this before--matte, waxy, and very soft; no crispness, all "give." It's as if the air were filled with moisture and the cards had absorbed it just enough to lose any "snap" they may once have had (I suspect they never had it).
It's disconcerting and gives me pause in using them. I could quite easily damage these. Actually, one of the corners on a card is already peeling after one gentle shuffle and being ported about in the (very nice) drawstring bag that came with the deck.
Has anyone laminated these? I don't want to do so because I want cards in my hand, not plastic, if I can help it. But otherwise, I can't see these lasting without major damage for more than one October, much less season.
Back later to share my substantive impressions of the deck in readings.
I would like this thread to focus on your impressions, a few years later, of using and reading with this deck.
I will start off with usage and post later about reading/content.
The major usage issues implicated here are the small size of the cards and the card stock. As to the former, I am surprisingly amenable to the deck despite my strong preference for large sized images. I think this is because the images take up so much of the card, with only a very narrow white border.
Second issue of card stock is not so favorable.
I saved the first time use of these for October and even in this lower-humidity (for where I live) season, it's hard not to notice the extreme softness of the cardstock. I've never felt cards like this before--matte, waxy, and very soft; no crispness, all "give." It's as if the air were filled with moisture and the cards had absorbed it just enough to lose any "snap" they may once have had (I suspect they never had it).
It's disconcerting and gives me pause in using them. I could quite easily damage these. Actually, one of the corners on a card is already peeling after one gentle shuffle and being ported about in the (very nice) drawstring bag that came with the deck.
Has anyone laminated these? I don't want to do so because I want cards in my hand, not plastic, if I can help it. But otherwise, I can't see these lasting without major damage for more than one October, much less season.
Back later to share my substantive impressions of the deck in readings.