Premdas
Hi LePendu! Yeah... loved it!
Hi Greg, no problem, everyone have his own sensitivity. Just know that my purpose is not to attack anyone, even if the personalities of some tarot makers who claim to have produce the "only real and authentic tarot" are a little bit "too much" in my sense. I feel Kris Hadar's arguments are not fonded and really flimsy. It's not a so called stairway in some Queen minor arcana who is sufficient and permit to claim that "my Tarot is the real one". It's true Camoin didn't reveal his sources for some time, and that he got his own style of presenting the things, thinking he and Jodo are "the only masters of tarot for the whole world" (sic.), but now he does explain some things and regarding many details restored, his arguments are completely fonded by visual poofs. he presents the old cards with the snakes on the Temperance's dresse and the egg hidden/revealed by the Popess. This is not his invention, no need to be a big "master" inspired by God directly to compare some old decks and find the missig details. And it is usefull for everyone who got a real interest in TdM. I don't speak about the book of Jodo in this purpose (it is what it is, not my subject at all), I just speak about restoration of TdM.
"it's a good deck, although not really an improvement over the Grimaud."
How can u say that? There is much improvement!!! It's really an historical deck. Does the Grimaud shows an egg under the Popess's dress and the Eagle of the Emperor? Snakes around the Temperance's dress? Aren't these details fonded on historical old decks? Weren't some of these really details on the grinds of the Conver, but unfortunately didn't appear because of errors of colouring?
Again, don't mind, my goal is not to criticize, juste exchanging point of vue and respecting yours.
Hi ElTarot, thanks for your posts. Do you know from what old deck is coming this Popess with an egg presented on the Camoin's slideshow?
Again, why does Camoin hide the name of this deck by only saying it's an old deck...? Why don't he simply share these treasures with others? Why trying absolutely to preserve a monopole? Well, I don't ask u to answer these question, but we are all in right to ask ourselves.
Anyway, it's a good advice for all TdM pasionnate people of the world, especially TdM restorers or discoverer of TdM ciffer: it's probably a nice feeling to think "I am the master of tarot for the whole world", "the tarot I produced is the only real one"... but it an illusion... another egg ou ego who must hatch one day for the embryo not being rotten.
Hi Greg, no problem, everyone have his own sensitivity. Just know that my purpose is not to attack anyone, even if the personalities of some tarot makers who claim to have produce the "only real and authentic tarot" are a little bit "too much" in my sense. I feel Kris Hadar's arguments are not fonded and really flimsy. It's not a so called stairway in some Queen minor arcana who is sufficient and permit to claim that "my Tarot is the real one". It's true Camoin didn't reveal his sources for some time, and that he got his own style of presenting the things, thinking he and Jodo are "the only masters of tarot for the whole world" (sic.), but now he does explain some things and regarding many details restored, his arguments are completely fonded by visual poofs. he presents the old cards with the snakes on the Temperance's dresse and the egg hidden/revealed by the Popess. This is not his invention, no need to be a big "master" inspired by God directly to compare some old decks and find the missig details. And it is usefull for everyone who got a real interest in TdM. I don't speak about the book of Jodo in this purpose (it is what it is, not my subject at all), I just speak about restoration of TdM.
"it's a good deck, although not really an improvement over the Grimaud."
How can u say that? There is much improvement!!! It's really an historical deck. Does the Grimaud shows an egg under the Popess's dress and the Eagle of the Emperor? Snakes around the Temperance's dress? Aren't these details fonded on historical old decks? Weren't some of these really details on the grinds of the Conver, but unfortunately didn't appear because of errors of colouring?
Again, don't mind, my goal is not to criticize, juste exchanging point of vue and respecting yours.
Hi ElTarot, thanks for your posts. Do you know from what old deck is coming this Popess with an egg presented on the Camoin's slideshow?
Again, why does Camoin hide the name of this deck by only saying it's an old deck...? Why don't he simply share these treasures with others? Why trying absolutely to preserve a monopole? Well, I don't ask u to answer these question, but we are all in right to ask ourselves.
Anyway, it's a good advice for all TdM pasionnate people of the world, especially TdM restorers or discoverer of TdM ciffer: it's probably a nice feeling to think "I am the master of tarot for the whole world", "the tarot I produced is the only real one"... but it an illusion... another egg ou ego who must hatch one day for the embryo not being rotten.