Umbrae
My opinion...
One should never confuse the deck with the message, or how the message is delivered.
True, SOME readers may give consistently grim forecasts with a dark deck, or see only a pessimistic outlook. However these same readers may provide similar insights from a Sunny Bunny Deck.
Speaking from personal experience, I've delivered some pretty optimistic and sunny readings with the Giger Tarot.
I actually hunt down dark decks. Many fall flat. There are a few 'get on the bandwagon and draw it as quickly as possible on a computer' where what makes horror work is never examined.
And that really is the bottom line of the question.
Why does horror work?
Why are there a slew of 'Real Ghost Hunter' TV shows?
Why are horror movies always pulling in huge crowds?
Why are Stephan King, Peter Straub, and Dean Koontz so poplar?
You know, we always use the “For Entertainment Purposes Only” tagline (often mandated by legal authorities). But we wince at the thought of a sitter coming in for a bit of their own campfire story.
On one hand we have Tarot as a game, and on the other we have Tarot – the spooky stuff. (Play around in the strange worlds of Tarot long enough - you will experience spooky stuff).
If a sitter wants spooky stuff – why the hell not?
Mind you, you won't be sanitizing any of these decks. (I have one deck, I pulled out all the cards with skeletons to not frighten the pikers, and was left with only one card...Death. (LOL)).
Yes you can do very serious, deep readings with dark decks. Just like you can with Gummi Bears or the Tarot of Bug Eye'd Not So Cute Critters.
Reading Tarot (for others), boils down to working with symbols. You can dress them symbols up any way you choose. The Solleone, The Bohemian Gothic, Baphomet, The Deviant Moon...all wrap their imagery around the same symbols. It is the symbols that provide the meaning that the reader imparts to the sitter (okay perhaps not the Baphomet, but I'm making a point here...sheesh...).
Your darling Aunt Zelda may look like she wants the Sunny Bunny Tarot, but she may want to watch you spin the same message from something faintly reminiscent of an 1890's seance. Or perhaps something even more 'taboo'...like that deck you have that's haunted...
ETA: Funny...just earlier today I was thinking about Krampus, and how we've sanitized Christmas. But we haven't really, that's a local viewpoint driven by...I dunno.
When one considers the sheer global Tarot Market, and includes the Asain markets and their influence, darker themed decks are a very tiny fraction of the market. But to us in the market where it (the dark genres) sells, it is more visible.
And we giggle at Detective Conan, and say that Prince of Tennis is not Tarot. However they are.
It's our view of Tarot that is not universal. Just like in Tarocchi playing areas, the viewpoint is different than ours.
It boils down to how rigidly we choose to define tarot...
Just an opinon...
One should never confuse the deck with the message, or how the message is delivered.
True, SOME readers may give consistently grim forecasts with a dark deck, or see only a pessimistic outlook. However these same readers may provide similar insights from a Sunny Bunny Deck.
Speaking from personal experience, I've delivered some pretty optimistic and sunny readings with the Giger Tarot.
pasara said:Why are there so many "creepy" decks, and why are they so popular?
...
Do you own a deck like this? And, what attracts you to it? Do you use it for a particular type of reading? And finally, how do your sitters respond to this type of deck?
I actually hunt down dark decks. Many fall flat. There are a few 'get on the bandwagon and draw it as quickly as possible on a computer' where what makes horror work is never examined.
And that really is the bottom line of the question.
Why does horror work?
Why are there a slew of 'Real Ghost Hunter' TV shows?
Why are horror movies always pulling in huge crowds?
Why are Stephan King, Peter Straub, and Dean Koontz so poplar?
You know, we always use the “For Entertainment Purposes Only” tagline (often mandated by legal authorities). But we wince at the thought of a sitter coming in for a bit of their own campfire story.
On one hand we have Tarot as a game, and on the other we have Tarot – the spooky stuff. (Play around in the strange worlds of Tarot long enough - you will experience spooky stuff).
If a sitter wants spooky stuff – why the hell not?
Mind you, you won't be sanitizing any of these decks. (I have one deck, I pulled out all the cards with skeletons to not frighten the pikers, and was left with only one card...Death. (LOL)).
Yes you can do very serious, deep readings with dark decks. Just like you can with Gummi Bears or the Tarot of Bug Eye'd Not So Cute Critters.
Reading Tarot (for others), boils down to working with symbols. You can dress them symbols up any way you choose. The Solleone, The Bohemian Gothic, Baphomet, The Deviant Moon...all wrap their imagery around the same symbols. It is the symbols that provide the meaning that the reader imparts to the sitter (okay perhaps not the Baphomet, but I'm making a point here...sheesh...).
Your darling Aunt Zelda may look like she wants the Sunny Bunny Tarot, but she may want to watch you spin the same message from something faintly reminiscent of an 1890's seance. Or perhaps something even more 'taboo'...like that deck you have that's haunted...
ETA: Funny...just earlier today I was thinking about Krampus, and how we've sanitized Christmas. But we haven't really, that's a local viewpoint driven by...I dunno.
When one considers the sheer global Tarot Market, and includes the Asain markets and their influence, darker themed decks are a very tiny fraction of the market. But to us in the market where it (the dark genres) sells, it is more visible.
And we giggle at Detective Conan, and say that Prince of Tennis is not Tarot. However they are.
It's our view of Tarot that is not universal. Just like in Tarocchi playing areas, the viewpoint is different than ours.
It boils down to how rigidly we choose to define tarot...
Just an opinon...