Yes. Bizarre to say, in the same one minute video, that tarot is "an ancient, beautiful language of the divine" that can give "accurate answers", but at the same time implying that tarot is intimidating and frightening and is not "in the light" (otherwise why the need to bring int "into the light")
It seems that her decks have assisted some people who were going through a rough patch or were suffering from personal burdens or struggles when they bought it. Her decks do have a niche, and if it has really helped some people, even if I won't traffick in any of her decks I would prefer that they be available for some folk who might need them in the future. That's just my opinion tho.
OK, here's the thing. And this is probably going to be my last post on this thread because in the end I have zero interest in DV decks and thus have no dog in this fight. Whether she continues churning out her fluff is immaterial to me.
I guess even the toughest of us need soothing at some point. And that's OK. However, we all know that there are roughly two types of querents: the ones who want to find out the truth, or at least to understand it better, and the ones who want to be told exactly what they want to hear --and be soothed and mollycoddled in the process. We all know those people; those are the ones who get twenty readings if necessary until someone tells them that so-and-so will leave their SO for them, even if they know in their heart of hearts that it is is not going to happen.
IMHO, DV and her collaborator Bathory Valentine (aka "Giggles") are shamelessly catering to this second category. Which is, in the end, their prerogative: it is, after all, a free world. My problem here is not even that they are creating spurious Tarot decks with the Swords made into fluffy flying unicorns. (Again, it's a free world. And I even bought that deck, and burned my retinas in the process.) My problem, really, is that, in order to attract their quivering, blubbering clientele, they keep intimating that traditional Tarot is this dark, dangerous thing that needs cleaning up and sanitizing.
IMHO again, in the realm of divination, soothing is the province of oracles. Angel oracles, daily affirmation oracles, whatever, they deserve a place under the sun. And even bad, fluffy Tarot decks for the terminally faint of heart; that's fine. But implying -- or outright saying, as they do often, even in writing -- that with their fluorescent creations they are "bringing Tarot into the light," or that Tarot, and the truth, are themselves scary and dark and icky (a suspiciously worded Amazon review of the Angel Tarot Cards says that it is "an Angel oracle deck [...] made to mirror the traditional Tarot, but without all of the negativity and ego based properties that some tend to associate with the Tarot") is profoundly twisted, and pretty much slanderous, and, well, icky.