Little Baron
That is a sad story, KK. Thanks for sharing.
Yes, I agree that there probably isn't much difference between the tarot and playing cards.
In this case, I think it is the method of reading, described in my last post, that makes the difference. As you are interested in numbers and reading non-scenic cards, I would be most interested in your thoughts about the process. It is simple to grasp but by no means, offers simplistic or general answers.
The other thing I do like about playing cards is the brashness of image. The black or red against the white. Even though I prefer the Conver, in appearance to most Marseille, I often like the pips of the Hadar or Grimaud more because they are so stark - making the interpretation clearer for me. This is what I get from playing cards - no interferance.
LB
Yes, I agree that there probably isn't much difference between the tarot and playing cards.
In this case, I think it is the method of reading, described in my last post, that makes the difference. As you are interested in numbers and reading non-scenic cards, I would be most interested in your thoughts about the process. It is simple to grasp but by no means, offers simplistic or general answers.
The other thing I do like about playing cards is the brashness of image. The black or red against the white. Even though I prefer the Conver, in appearance to most Marseille, I often like the pips of the Hadar or Grimaud more because they are so stark - making the interpretation clearer for me. This is what I get from playing cards - no interferance.
LB