nuttyprofessor
Yes, I have been aware of this. But taking a topsy turvy meaning for a reversed card is a sort of symbolic logic. The card is as it were asking for an alternative read.One can argue that the use of reversed cards itself is a form of yes/no questioning, where we basically ask the cards to show us if the reversed 'rules' should apply or not.
This is not fair. One third goes to the sitter, and the other twothirds to the other. This is better: Card 1,2,3 - the sitter, Card 4,5,6 the other. And forget about the event, because that is the business of the major arcana.I still think a bit of structuring may do the trick. Since 6 is neatly divided by 3, you may want to try something like this:
a Court in 1 and 2 - always the sitter
a Court in 3 and 4 - another person or event
a Court in 5 and 6 - always another person
But still I have some reservations. Suppose there are several court cards in a row. It makes less sense to refer two cards to the same person.