The Thoth *tarot* deck has many unique things, but it depends on who is talking
.
Anyway, one important thing is that it differs from RWS in structure and in some cards' names - and both Thoth and RWS are considered 'base' decks. Most decks either follow Thoth or RWS style. It's interesting that Crowley's and Waite's deck different, since they were both based on Golden Down tradition, just as Similia said below.
Hydra said:
I use both arcanas for my celctic cross spread...but my books says to use only minor arcana...does it matter?
Hum...yes, it does. Major cards are REALLY important ones, a reading without them isn't as good as one with them, imho. Want a friendly advice? Use both minor and major arcana...this thing of 'separating' them rarely works well. The cards were made to be used together, hence why we have a dack of 78 card, not a deck of 22 and another deck with 56. Just my opinion.
Hydra said:
just one more thing, do you always have to use reversed cards, does it depend on the deck you use? Because I didint in the begining and it seemed to come out great, and now i am starting to, just wanted your imput
Oh, the reversals question is very common here - search for reversals threads and you'll find loads. I personally don't work with them...i think they are confusing and simply don't do it for me. I like to see the cards upright, period. But some people use reversals and like them. It's a personal choice.
Some decks are made to be read with reversals, but that doesn't mean the have to. Any deck can use reversals, as any can use only upright position. Reversals is something personal...a method to work with.
You should try both - with reversals and without them. That's the best way to see what you really like/work better with and then...go for it
Hope i helped you, in a way or another. Feel free to ask more, my virtual door is always opened.
Welcome to AT, by the way...why you don't introduce yourself in the 'i'm new' forum so everyone can greet you nicely?
Yuko