Solitaire* said:
Think of the differences in the way men and women express and control feelings. You'll probably find your answer then. A man controls his feelings because it's the "manly" thing to do.
True, but if any man is going to cry and show his feelings it's the King/Cups
I think you're right, by the way, that it's not a difference in how much feeling, but in how the King/Queen act when struck by such feelings. But I think saying that the King is going to "man up" on his feelings isn't quite there. Because if ever there was a sensitive male, unafraid to express his softer feelings, it's the King/Cups. He'll weep openly, he'll say, "I love you!" without hesitation, he'll delight in being romantic, and enfold those who hurt into his arms. He's not one of those "man's man" types.
But what he is is "fire" as compared to the Queen's "water." And that, in male fashion, means, I think, that he's more likely to take action. It's that difference, I think, between a woman wanting a sympathetic ear, and a guy wanting a solution. If the King's daughter is crying, he's going to feel that pain deeply, and he's going to enfold her and try to comfort her. But he's also going to want to fix it. "How can daddy make it right?" he'll ask. Because his first instinct is to act.
The Queen is going to feel her daughter's pain and comfort her, but instead of heading off to beat up the daughter's no-good boyfriend, the queen is going to spend time letting the girl talk all about it. Handing her tissues as she weeps, and making sympathetic comments to show that she understands, agreeing whole-heartedly that the daughter doesn't deserve such a no-good boyfriend...and maybe she and the daughter should have some ice cream? Would that make the daughter feel better?
The Queen goes with the flow of the emotions, wherever they take her to whatever conclusion seems right. The King, however, gets set on fire by those emotions, he has to act on them.