Shade
I thought I was going to get more of the LS 2014 lineup but in the end only added the Divine Feminine to my collection this year (and while I love the mood in the DF I prefer the Universal Goddess). Here's what I'm planning for 2015:
Romantic Tarot: No. Erotic LS decks I like but this looks too Harlequin Romance for me. I do imagine that anyone who enjoys a good bodice-ripper could love it.
Infinity Tarot: Big no. I liked the Circle of Life deck from them and this seems to be in that vein but I feel like the premise is a gimmick.
Happy Tarot: Maaaaybe? Of the "cute" decks out there I like the look of this much more than something like the Tiny Tots or Whimsical Tarot and I do appreciate that description indicates it's for those days when you need a nice, positive reading.
Meta-Barons: I think so, I really like the Jodorowsky connection and it seems captivating. It's probably only going to get used on those "and now for something completely different" days.
Impressionist Tarot: No. It's lovely but not my go-to art style.
Thelema: Surprisingly yes. I'm not anti-CGI decks but this comes perilously close to being the type of CGI that makes people look lifeless but the Thelema connection has me intrigued and the Magician seems kind of hunky.
Barbieri: Yes, the art looks dynamic and the world seems intriguing, like an especially enigmatic comic book universe.
Romantic Tarot: No. Erotic LS decks I like but this looks too Harlequin Romance for me. I do imagine that anyone who enjoys a good bodice-ripper could love it.
Infinity Tarot: Big no. I liked the Circle of Life deck from them and this seems to be in that vein but I feel like the premise is a gimmick.
Happy Tarot: Maaaaybe? Of the "cute" decks out there I like the look of this much more than something like the Tiny Tots or Whimsical Tarot and I do appreciate that description indicates it's for those days when you need a nice, positive reading.
Meta-Barons: I think so, I really like the Jodorowsky connection and it seems captivating. It's probably only going to get used on those "and now for something completely different" days.
Impressionist Tarot: No. It's lovely but not my go-to art style.
Thelema: Surprisingly yes. I'm not anti-CGI decks but this comes perilously close to being the type of CGI that makes people look lifeless but the Thelema connection has me intrigued and the Magician seems kind of hunky.
Barbieri: Yes, the art looks dynamic and the world seems intriguing, like an especially enigmatic comic book universe.