agviz
Hi Storm82, I'll try to post some side-by-side shots this weekend. I think though, that the color variation on the fronts is not a as noticeable of a thing as the backs. You can decide for yourself when I post some comparisons.
PCS Centennial, deck only version
Storm82
thankyou for your help!
do you think the colors are very different from the regular riderwaite deck thats out there?
Ambrosia
The colours are MASSIVELY different. Muted and really quite pretty.
agviz
Yes, as Ambrosia says, there's quite a bit of difference in the color. Here's a comparison of some various RWS decks.
agviz
After closely comparing the deck-only and kit versions, I'm seeing so little of a color difference that it wasn't worth scanning a sample. Again, it's just the backs that have a noticeable difference.
Storm82
ok,
you have the deck only version (not in a tin?) ?
the cardstock is same/different?
you have the deck only version (not in a tin?) ?
the cardstock is same/different?
agviz
Right, I'm comparing the deck-only (not in a tin) to the kit. The card stock is very similar, but the kit version is slightly stiffer to shuffle. That's the only difference I notice.
Storm82
agviz
No hassle. Although I wish it was a bit less stiff, it's not so bad that it deters me from working with it. The stiffness difference between the two decks is slight. Ultimately, the kit version is my all-time favorite tarot deck.
If you are debating which of these decks to get, I would recommend the kit because of the extras you get. The book on PCS is especially nice. I wouldn't fret over the subtle differences between the two decks and then miss out on those extras.
If you are debating which of these decks to get, I would recommend the kit because of the extras you get. The book on PCS is especially nice. I wouldn't fret over the subtle differences between the two decks and then miss out on those extras.
